Well you are right, we are different. I see the Z lenses as a group sharper than their F mount counterparts but in some cases the rendering is not what I am looking for. The 85 is the exception for me and is the only Z lens that has gotten my attention. I understand the form factor point but am actually somewhat turned off by the smaller body unless I am using really small lenses which some of the Z's are not. I prefer the larger body as it fits my hand better. I find the smaller bodies somewhat fiddly in nature but the Zs are certainly better than the Sony's to be sure.The extra bulk does not bother me if I am getting stellar results. I am however very interested in the Z7 because of the extra resolution, in camera stabilization, better autofocus accuracy, some usable eye focus, future proofing. I will not be letting my D810 go as I love this camera and I love the idea of a hybrid system. One of Nikons strengths in my opinion.
But to your point, the idea of a smaller lens on a smaller body for candids is very compelling and is the single biggest reason why I will probably wind up with the 85 and the 105 when the time comes (later next year). I would not be surprised if the 85 will be the only Z lens I will ever own. I am very happy with the 35 Tamron 1.4, 58, 105 and 70-200E. No reason to sell any of these ever which I suppose answers my question. I love these forums as it helps work out some tough decisions.
Thanks to all who took the time to share.
Nov 12, 2019 at 04:12 AM
Previous versions of aerospace99's message #15043014 « Nikon 85 1.8S vs 105 1.4E Results »
