I just have converted a a dpreview sample picture to test the DR. The results are slightly better compared to the 80D:
90D ISO 100:
DR at 32MP: 12.468 DR at 8MP: 13.480 (+1.012)
read noise: 2.80125
80D ISO 100:
DR at 24MP: 12.435 EV
DR at 8MP: 13.2343 (+0.7993)
read noise: 2.86601
The improvement is tiny, close to the measure error. But Canon has managed to keep the same performance despite the smaller pixels (not too difficult, that was the trick the 5DS used to stand out in the old times). After taking into account the normalization, the new sensor is around 0.25 EV better.
EDIT: see this post bellow for updated data at the whole ISO range
I just have converted a a dpreview sample picture to test the DR. The results are slightly better compared to the 80D:
90D ISO 100:
DR at 32MP: 12.468 DR at 8MP: 13.480 (+1.012)
read noise: 2.80125
80D ISO 100:
DR at 24MP: 12.435 EV
DR at 8MP: 13.2343 (+0.7993)
read noise: 2.86601
The improvement is tiny, close to the measure error. But Canon has managed to keep the same performance despite the smaller pixels (not too difficult, that was the trick the 5DS used to stand out in the old times). After taking into account the normalization, the new sensor is around 0.25 EV better.
EDIT: see this post bellow for updated data at the whole ISO range
I just have converted a a dpreview sample picture to test the DR. The results are slightly better compared to the 80D:
90D ISO 100:
DR at 32MP: 12.468 DR at 8MP: 13.480 (+1.012)
read noise: 2.80125
80D ISO 100:
DR at 24MP: 12.435 EV
DR at 8MP: 13.2343 (+0.7993)
read noise: 2.86601
The improvement is tiny, close to the measure error. But Canon has managed to keep the same performance despite the smaller pixels (not too difficult, that was the trick the 5DS used to stand out in the old times). After taking into account the normalization, the new sensor is around 0.25 EV better.
I just have converted a a dpreview sample picture to test the DR. The results are slightly better compared to the 80D:
90D ISO 100:
DR at 32MP: 12.468 DR at 8MP: 13.480 (+1.012)
read noise: 2.80125
80D ISO 100:
DR at 24MP: 12.435 EV
DR at 8MP: 13.2343 (+0.7993)
read noise: 2.86601
The improvement is tiny, close to the measure error. But Canon has managed to keep the same performance despite the smaller pixels (not too difficult, that was the trick the 5DS used to stand out in the old times). After taking into account the normalization, the new sensor is around 0.25 EV better.
Aug 31, 2019 at 01:30 PM
Previous versions of cgarcia's message #14964002 « EOS 90D dynamic range »
