GMPhotography wrote: cswinton wrote: GMPhotography wrote: molson wrote: GMPhotography wrote:
Good luck guys. Hope you get a good one
And this is why I gave up on Sony... same reason I stopped buying lottery tickets.
You think its any better with Canon , Nikon, Leica than that is truly wishful thinking. Ive been through every dang system and its the same thing. I will NEVER go back to DSLR stuff. Frankly I would go back to Medium Format with all its limitations before i would by any other 35mm system. This is the end of the road for me.
I agree. I’m bugged about this current lens issue but I won’t pretend I haven’t had issues in other systems. Not having to deal with micro-focus adjustments since leaving the DSLR world has been refreshing.
Agree and I truly feel bad for folks that are going through this but I have had my share for sure. It sucks but when it comes to zooms given the complexity of the lens elements , zooming and lens groups its a pretty common to find a bad lens in any brand. Zooms are the worst offenders of copy variance. We have seen it in even the GM 24-70 and GM 70-200 and of course the 12-24 and now here with the 24-105. I just retested mine since you folks got me so spooked and I'm fine. i was testing to do some video so thought Id check again.
We could all just go back to shooting film -- or even the sensors of just a few years ago -- and we wouldn't be able to see any of these first world problems!
Feb 06, 2018 at 01:42 PM
Previous versions of Parariss's message #14354189 « New FE 24-105 f/4. How good? »
