Interesting read. I own the Canon 24-105/4 mk I and was surprised to see how even the two are - MTF numbers as well as physically. Wondering if it is worth getting Metabones for $400 to use the Canon vs getting the Sony native for $1300 (and trying to get $500 here for the Canon).
Anyone use the Canon with Metabones IV/V on the a7rIII?
Get the Sigma MC-11 for around $150 new from B&H or Adorama and use your Canon. Until I find out the Sony is astoundingly better, I'll stay with my Canon 24-105Ll
Interesting read. I own the Canon 24-105/4 mk I and was surprised to see how even the two are - MTF numbers as well as physically. Wondering if it is worth getting Metabones for $400 to use the Canon vs getting the Sony native for $1300 (and trying to get $500 here for the Canon).
Anyone use the Canon with Metabones IV/V on the a7rIII?
Get the Sigma MC-11 for around $150 new from B&H or Adorama and use your Canon. Until I find out the Sony is astoundingly better, I'll still with my Canon 24-105Ll
Dec 13, 2017 at 01:54 PM
Previous versions of Gunzorro's message #14288725 « New FE 24-105 f/4. How good? »
