Re: FE 16-35 f/2.8 & FE 12-24 f/4 Announcement Today???
AGeoJO wrote: molson wrote: chez wrote:
The 12-24 looks very interesting. It's size seems smaller than the Sigma. Might make a great lens for travel. Need to wait for images to justify the price.
It doesn't take filters, though - so it's of little use to me for landscape photography with no way to attach a polarizer.
I used to think that way also but lately, I have put more and more "digital" filters into works. Frankly, I don't remember the last time I used a physical filter on my lens. Of course, I fully realize that your or everybody's need will vary widely. I am speaking only about mine in this case.
No such thing as a digital polarizer, unfortunately.
Aside from that, it looks like an interesting lens.
Re: FE 16-35 f/2.8 & FE 12-24 f/4 Announcement Today???
AGeoJO wrote: molson wrote: chez wrote:
The 12-24 looks very interesting. It's size seems smaller than the Sigma. Might make a great lens for travel. Need to wait for images to justify the price.
It doesn't take filters, though - so it's of little use to me for landscape photography with no way to attach a polarizer.
I used to think that way also but lately, I have put more and more "digital" filters into works. Frankly, I don't remember the last time I used a physical filter on my lens. Of course, I fully realize that your or everybody's need will vary widely. I am speaking only about mine in this case.
No such thing as a digital polarizer, unfortunately.
May 17, 2017 at 11:44 AM
Previous versions of molson's message #14040312 « Pre-order Now! Sony FE 16-35/2.8 GM and FE 12-24/4 G »
