That\'s okay, I for one am very interested in this topic, to the point I registered with FM Forums soley to contribute to this thread 😀
I\'m grateful the OP stated this thread, because with out him, I probably would if went on using less then desired performance on the ZM lenses I own, which would mean they would get used less and less, and ultimately could of gotten sold.
So, thank you to the OP for starting this thread.
I ultimately have achieved what I set out to do, which was find which filters worked for my Zeiss ZM wide angle lenses.
I\'m very interested if the correction lenses help other lenses like Voigtlander and Leica wide angles.
artur5 wrote:
Are you using the Nikon No.0 with the ZM35/1.4 ?. According to HaruhikoT, this lens requires, in theory, a much weaker filter. If you\'re able to reach only 1.5m. with the Nikon filter, I guess that you\'d need to move back the infinity mark 0.7-0.9mm. on the Hawks adapter. It seems doubtful that it allows so much tunning, but hopefully the dilemma will be solved tomorrow.
BTW the thread starter, HaruhikoT, after opening this can of worms, seems to have lost all interest on the matter..
That\'s okay, I for one am very interested in this topic, to the point I registered with FM Forums soley to contribute to this thread 😀
I ultimately have achieved what I set out to do, which was find which filters worked for my Zeiss ZM wide angle lenses.
I\'m very interested if the correction lenses help other lenses like Voigtlander and Leica wide angles.
artur5 wrote:
Are you using the Nikon No.0 with the ZM35/1.4 ?. According to HaruhikoT, this lens requires, in theory, a much weaker filter. If you\'re able to reach only 1.5m. with the Nikon filter, I guess that you\'d need to move back the infinity mark 0.7-0.9mm. on the Hawks adapter. It seems doubtful that it allows so much tunning, but hopefully the dilemma will be solved tomorrow.
BTW the thread starter, HaruhikoT, after opening this can of worms, seems to have lost all interest on the matter..
