Matt Grum wrote:
I probably wont be coming back because I discovered that I really like a) electronic viewfinders b) in body image stabilisation. Can\'t see either of those on a full frame Canon any time soon.
Cool beans @ finding what you like. That\'s always a good thing, no matter the name on the Rose.
+1 @ I don\'t see Canon going to those things either.
Not that it should really matter, but I do appreciate someone simply saying, \"Hey, I like this better.\" Imo, that\'s good stuff without all the effort to denounce the other. We (self included) should all rise to that level of class deserving of good FM membership.
Matt Grum wrote:
How about... other: 13.5 stops is theoretically available using an awkward workflow which includes double sized RAWs,
Is the \"awkward workflow\" to achieve 13.5 ... or is it to raise the 13.5 to 14.5 ... with 13.5 being from the regular workflow?
Matt Grum wrote:
I probably wont be coming back because I discovered that I really like a) electronic viewfinders b) in body image stabilisation. Can\'t see either of those on a full frame Canon any time soon.
Cool beans @ finding what you like. That\'s always a good thing, no matter the name on the Rose.
+1 @ I don\'t see Canon going to those things either.
Not that it should really matter, but I do appreciate someone simply saying, \"Hey, I like this better.\" Imo, that\'s good stuff without all the effort to denounce the other. We (self included) should all rise to that level of class deserving of good FM membership.
Matt Grum wrote:
How about... other: 13.5 stops is theoretically available using an awkward workflow which includes double sized RAWs,
Is the \"awkward workflow\" to achieve 13.5 ... or is it to raise the 13.5 to 14.5 ... with 13.5 being from the regular workflow?
Matt Grum wrote:
I probably wont be coming back because I discovered that I really like a) electronic viewfinders b) in body image stabilisation. Can\'t see either of those on a full frame Canon any time soon.
Cool beans @ finding what you like. That\'s always a good thing, no matter the name on the Rose.
+1 @ I don\'t see Canon going to those things either.
Not that it should really matter, but I do appreciate someone simply saying, \"Hey, I like this better.\" Imo, that\'s good stuff without all the effort to denounce the other. We (self included) should all rise to that level of class deserving of good FM membership.
Sep 09, 2016 at 08:06 AM
Previous versions of RustyBug's message #13715669 « Canon 5D4 dynamic range analyzed from RAWs »
