I keep trying to find reasons I don\'t need this lens, but it keeps pulling at me like no other piece of gear ever has. My 300/2.8 AF-S II boosted my rodeo shots like no other lens has. I found that too restrictive as at times, it was a little too long. Got a 200-400/4 VR2 and love the range and excellent contrast, but I do notice a big difference going from f/2.8 to f/4. I\'m lucky enough to shoot in good lighting (most of the time) for now, but I\'m dreading the day the clouds come out or have a night event. f/4 will really crunch into my low ISOs and high shutter speeds that I\'ve become used to.
200/2 could essentially give me three different lenses and from what people say, there is little change in focus speed and sharpness.
I\'m loosing my mind lusting after this lens!!!
May 13, 2016 at 12:36 PM
Previous versions of Weasel_Loader's message #13558082 « The Nikon 200mm f/2 Thread - part 2 »
