fredmiranda.com
Login
Edit history

Official: Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 III E-mount

Message #13553288 by pdmphoto · 1 earlier version stored · newest first

Back to the post
Current versionSaved May 10, 2016 at 03:20 PMTitle changed
Official: Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 III E-mount
I don't think the expensive and mighty Zeiss FE 35/1.4 fares any better. There were also lots of Loxia 21's that were way off. The Zeiss 55/1.8 was very bad as well once users got around to testing it. Early 35/50 Loxia's had mechanical wobble. So CV has poor QA on one lens... Hang em high!!!

Bobu, I know you did have experience sending your Loxia 21 in to Zeiss to get it adjusted, but I haven't heard that happening with any of the Zeiss AF lenses. I don't know of a single 55/1.8 that was adjusted.

Of all the lenses I have owned, my Samsung NX (ooops, not PC!) lenses have the best record for QA reliability

Oh, I almost forgot the Zeiss 16-35
Original postPosted May 10, 2016 at 03:12 PM
Re: Voigtlander 15/4.5 III E-mount Rolling review
I don't think the expensive and mighty Zeiss FE 35/1.4 fares any better. There were also lots of Loxia 21's that were way off. The Zeiss 55/1.8 was very bad as well once users got around to testing it. Early 35/50 Loxia's had mechanical wobble. So CV has poor QA on one lens... Hang em high!!!

Bobu, I know you did have experience sending your Loxia 21 in to Zeiss to get it adjusted, but I haven't heard that happening with any of the Zeiss AF lenses. I don't know of a single 55/1.8 that was adjusted.

Of all the lenses I have owned, my Samsung NX (ooops, not PC!) lenses have the best record for QA reliability

Back to the post

Switch to mobile view