Well the 23 and 56 are not really big compared to the FF eqv. lenses. I think it was wise making theses lenses fast because that\'s what most enthusiastic photographers wan\'t. You have the choice of smaller primes 18-35-60 if you like to travel light and then you have the 23-56-90 if you want faster lenses. I however agree on the 10-24, I\'m hesitating to buy it because of the size, so I will probbaly end up with Samyang 12/2 and XF14 instead. But the 10-24 is a terrific performer and insanely wide ...so it\'s still alluring, at least for a landscape photographer.
Sep 22, 2014 at 05:28 AM
Previous versions of hauxon's message #12592445 « Fuji 90/F2 prototype - why so big and heavy? »
