Samuli Vahonen wrote:
Stass, thanks for the links. I already closed computer, will check tomorrow as well as your posting history. I was thinking getting few more OM glass (I currently have 24/2.8, 50/1.7 and 135/3.x), but 90mm f/2 is pretty expensive. Have to check also 85mm f/2, it would be 1/3 or 1/2 of price of 90mm...but 85mm might be also much worse than 90mm. At the moment don\'t want to spend too much on OM as it\'s \"just\" secondary set of \"brushes\" while I mostly shoot with Zeiss.
85/2 is actually great. I like it\'s bokeh much better than OM 90/2. It\'s a bit less sharp of course,
does not do macro and flares much easier, but bokeh is unbelievable to my taste. Another one
I like is 21/2 which is also expensive, but amazongly sharp and has a beautiful bokeh as well.
There iis also OM 50/1.4 which renders similar to summilux, but of course not that sharp. It\'s low
contrast is great for blacka and white though. 50/1.4, 21/2 and 90/2 are the lenses I use and enjoy
most on A7, and my best results came from the first two.
Mar 25, 2014 at 06:57 PM
Previous versions of stass's message #12231408 « Sony FE Images Thread »
