ytwong wrote:
The CV 35/1.2 seems really great for people shots, although I keep reading how bad it technically is.
At DXO I also read the M9 has weak sensor (well after dark, I guess that\'s true)
That\'s V1 of the 35/1.2, which is better, but you often read the opposite. But they are close and A7 especially loves them. Good for landscape also I think on that camera.
I also read reports dissing the CV at RFF--and you can read the 50/1.1 is soft over at Ken Rs site.
The truth is there are copy variations and focus calibration variations, so one guy gets bad shots, posts them, and we\'re off to the races.
In low light it\'s the best 35 in the world. Legendary Bokeh. And good for your biceps too
In the last month l learned the CV 35/2.5 is not so great on the A7 and terrible on the R, but it\'s incredible on the M9.
ytwong wrote:
The CV 35/1.2 seems really great for people shots, although I keep reading how bad it technically is.
At DXO I also read the M9 has weak sensor (well after dark, I guess that\'s true)
That\'s V1 of the 35/1.2, which is better, but you often read the opposite. But they are close and A7 especially loves them. Good for landscape also I think on that camera.
I also read reports dissing the CV at RFF--and you can read the 50/1.1 is soft over at Ken Rs site.
The truth is there are copy variations and focus calibration variations, so one guy gets bad shots, posts them, and we\'re off to the races.
In low light it\'s the best 35 in the world. Legendary Bokeh. And good for your biceps too
Now the CV 35/2.5 is not so great on the A7 and terrible on the R, but it\'s incredible on the M9.
ytwong wrote:
The CV 35/1.2 seems really great for people shots, although I keep reading how bad it technically is.
At DXO I also read the M9 has weak sensor (well after dark, I guess that\'s true)
That\'s V1 of the 35/1.2, which is better, but you often read the opposite. But they are close and A7 especially loves them. Good for landscape also I think on that camera.
I also read reports dissing the CV at RFF--and you can read the 50/1.1 is soft over at Ken Rs site.
The truth is there are copy variations and focus calibration variations, so one guy gets bad shots, posts them, and we\'re off to the races.
In low light it\'s the best 35 in the world. Legendary Bokeh. And good for your biceps too
Now the CV 35/2.5 is not so great on the A7 and terrible on the R, but it\'s incredible on the M9.
ytwong wrote:
The CV 35/1.2 seems really great for people shots, although I keep reading how bad it technically is.
At DXO I also read the M9 has weak sensor (well after dark, I guess that\'s true)
That\'s V1 of the 35/1.2, which is better, but you often read the opposite. But they are close and A7 especially loves them. Good for landscape also I think on that camera.
I also read reports dissing the CV at RFF--and you can read the 50/1.1 is soft over at Ken Rs site.
The truth is there are copy variations and focus calibration variations, so one guy gets bad shots, posts them, and we\'re off to the races.
In low light it\'s the best 35 in the world. Legendary Bokeh. And good for your biceps too
Jan 13, 2014 at 02:10 AM
Previous versions of uhoh7's message #12061874 « Sony FE Images Thread »
(well after dark, I guess that\'s true)
