fredmiranda.com
Login

  

  Previous versions of Kibsgaard's message #11020783 « Sigma DP2 Merrill: Have any of you tried it? »

  

Kibsgaard
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Sigma DP2 Merrill: Have any of you tried it?


carstenw wrote:


Very brief translation: lots of discussion about this and that and pixel size and acuity vs. acutance etc, but in the end he simply sees something he likes in the D700 photos which he doesn\'t find in D3x photos, in A3+ size prints.


OK, but a bit short:

Of course I will never say, that the D700 is better than the D3x,the opposite is the truth = The D3x is clearly better all in all, but sometimes the reality is not so .....


.....short described, it is like you have got a newer car, and it is better all in all, and you will not go back, but some details with the old car was truly better, because the car- manufactor \"forgot\" to include that in the new model.

Does that make sense ?

Another thing. If it should be the reason, that the D600 in the areas - described by MingThein - is not as good as D3 and D700 , and that it is a stronger AA-filter, that is the reason, and you have no problems with moire, well, then it is not good, that the AA-filter is stronger,

...but I stick to my own interpretations and not this interpretation.

----

And I have to repeat it again: It is first seen for real, when you print out huge looking side by side.



Oct 06, 2012 at 02:07 PM
Kibsgaard
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
Re: Sigma DP2 Merrill: Have any of you tried it?


carstenw wrote:


Very brief translation: lots of discussion about this and that and pixel size and acuity vs. acutance etc, but in the end he simply sees something he likes in the D700 photos which he doesn\'t find in D3x photos, in A3+ size prints.


OK, but a bit short:

Of course I will never say, that the D700 is better than the D3x,the opposite is the truth = The D3x is clearly better all in all, but sometimes the reality is not so .....


.....short described, it is like you have got a newer car, and it is better all in all, and you will not go back, but some details with the old car was truly better, because the car- manufactor \"forgot\" to include that in the new model.

Does that make sense ?

Another thing. If it should be the reason, that the D600 in the areas - described by MingThein - is not as good as D3 and D700 , and that it is a stronger AA-filter, that is the reason, and you have no problems with moire, well, then it is not good, that the AA-filter is stronger,

...but I stick to my own interpretations and not this interpretation.

And I have to repeat it again: It is first seen for real, when you print out huge.



Oct 06, 2012 at 02:02 PM





  Previous versions of Kibsgaard's message #11020783 « Sigma DP2 Merrill: Have any of you tried it? »