thrice wrote:
The M LCD is full sRGB colour space, 921k dots and all other specs the same as the RX1.
To me that seems superior.
why does lower resolution seem superior to you?
thrice wrote:
The EVF is obviously superior on the Sony.
why is that? i find the NEX-7 evf that will be on the rx1 (hopefully with improved optics) to be much better for manual focus (again due to higher res and a bigger screen) than the rebadged olympus one that leica is using.
thrice wrote:
I agree that Sony have excellent live view, but I find the peaking sometimes a little too aggressive (even in low mode). The M implementation is VERY exacting and subtle but I have not seen an example of how aggressive you can make it.
agreed about sony\'s peaking but i\'ve found that setting the color to white seems to make it less intrusive (at least through evf), but i\'ve found that i don\'t really need peaking and can focus faster and more accurately on the evf without zooming or peaking than i can on an slr (rangefinder is still faster, but not always as useful).
thrice wrote:
Electronics and responsiveness were great on the S, and that processor is now in the M, so I believe we will all have to reserve judgement until we see how the cameras perform.
i\'ve not used the S so i can\'t speak for it. i\'ve heard it is much better than the m9, but the S is not a liveview camera (heavier processing load), so we\'ll have to see. hopefully it won\'t be a problem. beyond processing speed a lot will depend on how the controls and interface are set up (perhaps you know more about this).
Sep 25, 2012 at 01:58 AM
Previous versions of sebboh's message #10991478 « Sony RX1 FF Mirrorless (Original 2012 thread) »
