a 28-70/4 would have to be much larger and much crappier in iq and build. also, being to stops slower would make much less useful in many occasions when you really want a small camera (eg social events).
Well, one may hope.... Though I love primes, I like them to be interchangeable. You give me fixed lens? Make it a zoom. Even a modest one.
And about being bigger, I have no problems with it. On the contrary. I often find small cameras uncomfortable to shoot. Heck, the RX1 is similar in size to the E-P3!
Happy shooting,
Yakim.
The problem is that it\'s not so much the camera that will be way bigger, but, rather the lenses. So, at that point, if the lenses are near SLR sized, anyways, one has to wonder the advantage over something like a D600.
For me, a single prime is perfect in a small camera, although, since it is 35mm, rather than 50mm, I\'m probably going to skip the RX1.
If the lens is not interchangeable then it could be smaller than the usual FF counterparts.
For me, a camera with a fixed prime lens is not something I\'m willing to spend a lot of money on.
Happy shooting,
Yakim.
Sep 21, 2012 at 05:38 PM
Previous versions of Yakim Peled's message #10982916 « Sony RX1 FF Mirrorless (Original 2012 thread) »
