I find it interesting that even in spite of all the ISO > 800 shots that have been presented, some even with the raw available, that Mike still stands by his own results. I have looked at his comparisons and samples on his photo gallery, and I am very confident he could have pulled better results had he pushed his exposure to the right (but moving up the ISO), and processing differently. There are more differences to 7D images based on software and exposure settings than due to variances in 7D hardware.
I would daresay that old dog didn\'t really do any new tricks but rearranged the same old tricks trying to get different results. And being an old dog myself, I earned the right to discuss old dogs and new tricks.
Also as this particular old dog gets older, and alzheimers kicks in, I will continue to be ignorant of the fact that my ISO > 800 shots are really subpar, even though I can print them as 20x30 posters that others enjoy!
I find it interesting that even in spite of all the ISO > 800 shots that have been presented, some even with the raw available, that Mike still stands by his own results. I have looked at his comparisons and samples on his photo gallery, and I am very confident he could have pulled better results had he pushed his exposure to the right (but moving up the ISO), and processing differently. There are more differences to 7D images based on software and exposure settings than due to variances in 7D hardware.
I would daresay that old dog didn\'t really do any new tricks but rearranged the same old tricks trying to get different results. And being an old dog myself, I earned the right to discuss old dogs and new tricks.
Also as this particular old dog gets older, and alzheimers kicks in, I will continue to be ignorant of the fact that my ISO > 800 shots are really subpar, even though I can print them as 20x30 posters that others enjoy!
I find it interesting that even in spite of all the ISO > 800 shots that have been presented, some even with the raw available, that Mike still stands by his own results. I have looked at his comparisons and samples on his photo gallery, and I am very confident he could have pulled better results had he pushed his exposure to the right (but moving up the ISO), and processing differently. There are more differences to 7D images based on software and exposure settings than due to variances in 7D hardware.
I would daresay that old dog didn\'t really do any new tricks but rearranged the same old tricks trying to get different results. And being an old dog myself, I earned the right to discuss old dogs and new tricks.
Also as this particular old dog gets older, and alzheimers kicks in, I will continue to be ignorant of the fact that my ISO > 800 shots are really subpar, even though I can print them as 20x30 posters that others enjoy!
Sep 05, 2012 at 05:18 PM
Previous versions of TeamSpeed's message #10937590 « How noisy is your 7D? »
