sebboh wrote:
in flickr go to the actions tab and choose "view all sizes"
then choose the size you want, right click on the image, and select "copy image url"
next simply paste that into FM.
Just be aware that doing that violates Flickr's terms, a link needs to be provided, click the "share" tab above the picture on the picture's comments page, that will give you options on sizing and formats(BBCode for FM)
LightShow wrote:
Just be aware that doing that violates Flickr's terms, a link needs to be provided, click the "share" tab above the picture on the picture's comments page, that will give you options on sizing and formats(BBCode for FM)
test:
edit: bb code works and if i throw away the 3. and 4. line of code it works faster than sebbohs "view all sizes"/original/copy url/paste-method i used before
Wow, what an amazing pictures again in this thread! I keep coming back to view all that creativtiy with the NEX. Thanks for sharing all The photos from Phillip Reeve and Sebboh especially are always intriguing, and I notice these are stitches. I believe I know how stitching works, but I thought this was meant for panoramas. Why is it that these pictures are stitches? Are you after more resolution? Or is it to overcome the crop factor with a lens that is not wide enough? Just curious why I see this stitching technique more often in this board/thread than anywhere else on the forums. The results are amazing, and I still wonder if I should apply this technique more often to get better photos than I do now with my old 1dsmkII :-( Sebboh, Phillip, care to share some of your stitching technique or direct me to some other URL where I can read further? Sorry if this is too much off topic. I am in awe about your photos!
fotofraag wrote:
Wow, what an amazing pictures again in this thread! I keep coming back to view all that creativtiy with the NEX. Thanks for sharing all The photos from Phillip Reeve and Sebboh especially are always intriguing, and I notice these are stitches. I believe I know how stitching works, but I thought this was meant for panoramas. Why is it that these pictures are stitches? Are you after more resolution? Or is it to overcome the crop factor with a lens that is not wide enough? Just curious why I see this stitching technique more often in this board/thread than anywhere else on the forums. The results are amazing, and I still wonder if I should apply this technique more often to get better photos than I do now with my old 1dsmkII :-( Sebboh, Phillip, care to share some of your stitching technique or direct me to some other URL where I can read further? Sorry if this is too much off topic. I am in awe about your photos!...Show more →
i personally use them for two main reasons: image quality and dof field. when i'm shooting something stationary why not use my best lens instead of some compromised wide angle. most of my panos run around 80-200mp and are sharp from corner to corner.
sometimes i want a narrowish dof field and a wider angle of view in which case stitching is really necessary (and usually harder).
fotofraag wrote:
Wow, what an amazing pictures again in this thread! I keep coming back to view all that creativtiy with the NEX. Thanks for sharing all The photos from Phillip Reeve and Sebboh especially are always intriguing, and I notice these are stitches. I believe I know how stitching works, but I thought this was meant for panoramas. Why is it that these pictures are stitches? Are you after more resolution? Or is it to overcome the crop factor with a lens that is not wide enough? Just curious why I see this stitching technique more often in this board/thread than anywhere else on the forums. The results are amazing, and I still wonder if I should apply this technique more often to get better photos than I do now with my old 1dsmkII :-( Sebboh, Phillip, care to share some of your stitching technique or direct me to some other URL where I can read further? Sorry if this is too much off topic. I am in awe about your photos!...Show more →
thanks
sebboh was my inspiration as well and i haven't done many of them.
I was more after the small dof, the 19 images-stitch in post #10 gave me the dof/angle as if i had shot something like a 20/0.6 lens.
I used a tripod to shoot the image and was surprised that i didn't have to do any manual corrections (for reasons of speed i exported the 19 images as 4mp jpgs and stitched them in PS, simply using the photomerge function).
I don't know any links, my approach was trial and error, and i was surprised how easy it is.
alba63 wrote:
Just curious: How do you stitch a rectangular image from 19 (!) shots. That is an odd number? 18 ok, 20 ok, but 19
Bernie
you need to give a fair amount of overlap between images, if you do it handheld you'll often end up with a different number of shots in each row or column.
alba63 wrote:
Just curious: How do you stitch a rectangular image from 19 (!) shots. That is an odd number? 18 ok, 20 ok, but 19
19 is not only an odd number, but also a prime number, (sorry, i'm studying mathematics )
I simply started shooting without caring about even shifts between the pictures and ended with 19 images.
I Cropped the stitched image quite a bit and it wasn't a rectangle
Phillip Reeve wrote:
19 is not only an odd number, but also a prime number, (sorry, i'm studying mathematics )
I simply started shooting without caring about even shifts between the pictures and ended with 19 images.
I knew it was a prime number, I just did not know the english word for "Primzahl", now I know that too.
Actually I generally have been seeing stitching as a way to increase resolution, creating a virtual high speed lens with ultra wide aperture is another one that I would like to try out.
The photos from Phillip Reeve and Sebboh especially are always intriguing, and I notice these are stitches. I believe I know how stitching works, but I thought this was meant for panoramas. Why is it that these pictures are stitches? Are you after more resolution? Or is it to overcome the crop factor with a lens that is not wide enough? Just curious why I see this stitching technique more often in this board/thread than anywhere else on the forums. The results are amazing, and I still wonder if I should apply this technique more often to get better photos than I do now with my old 1dsmkII :-( Sebboh, Phillip, care to share some of your stitching technique or direct me to some other URL where I can read further? Sorry if this is too much off topic. I am in awe about your photos!
)