Martin, like you set too, especially #3. I wonder where you find a yellow wire on coalish background like that - and some day you'll have to reveal your image numbering scheme
Acquired a truck (my first functional vehicle in more than 12 years) so now I can get out of town and do some landscape work. This is from Northern Ontario with the DT 16-50/2.8 SSM and the NEX-7
BluePixel wrote:
For the last two years our daughter has been battling stage 4 cancer.
Very moving image and I imagine extremely difficult times for you all. I cannot imagine how I would get through something like that with my children. Take care and I wish you both the best.
Here's a view with an extremely high ISO take… 25600, unfortunately… It's so easy to move the ISO value without realising… It's a view from the top of a waterfall.
FM is a great place for me to learn and i am still here when i have a free minute.
We've been through a lot in our life but last two years were the hardest.
To all:
aBellemare
inglis
wfrank
douglasf13
ulrikft2
sebboh
Jacob D
legaltrouble
m-a-x
FlyPenFly
taran
dennishh
Sirfishalot
DamonJoyce
Jabberwockt
LightShow
Gary Clennan
snowboarder
thanks for your kind comments, prayers, wishes and interest.
for my own curiousity i went back last night and took the same shot with my sony 16mm that i had taken on film with the rokkor 24/2.8 a month or so ago. certainly not a scientific comparison, but interesting to me for the different looks.
sony: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7117/7036589867_df5321f3a8_o.jpg
film (portra 400): http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7192/6890054403_565cf134bd_o.jpg
the digital shot has been processed a great deal more of course. obviously the weather and light was much different. the sony shot was in the rain and driving wind while the film shot was a much calmer day. i believe the film shot is at f/11 and the digital is at f/8 making them roughly equivalent. both shots were at slower shutter speeds than they should have been.
Awful light, not a bad lens but kinda on the slow side. Bokeh is decent.
Sharpness seems comparable to met to that of the Nikon 50-200mm VR which is actually pretty good. Bokeh is better. CA does show up wide open on bright highlights like glimmering metal but not really that noticeable on the NEX-7 because the high mpx kind of hides it. Build quality is very good like all the other E-Mount lenses.
