p.9 #2USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
LightShow wrote: I'm still looking for mine. (40 with the red Ð )
LeadyGonzales is to blame for the current price increases, too many wonderful images.
Whoops, my bad.
Lets just ban all nice helios 40 images for a year and see what happens. Any references to the lens should be regarding how over-rated it is. The grease can cause cancer.
p.9 #3USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
Love the Russian lenses. Of the ones I want, there are only two that have so far escaped me: the Helios 40 85mm and Jupiter 6 180mm. Those that I have are Helios 44, 44-2, 44-3, and 44M-7; Cyclop 85mm f/1.5; Tair-11 133mm f/2.8; and Jupiter 11 135mm f/4.
p.9 #5USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
Thanks, Chris. Many people think the 44-3 is best and published data indicate the 44M-7 is the sharpest. It's really hard to tell when doing side by side comparisons, so I go on both feel and my sense of image quality. At this time the 44-2 is my preference because of better build quality and a perceived better IQ, although the IQ is close throughout all the models. Build quality, on the other hand, is easier to evaluate and the later M-7 seems to me the worst of them. The aperture ring is clumsy; the earlier ones are presets and while the 44-3 doesn't seem as solid as the 44-2, it is more so than the M-7. However, I must reserve final judgment until I receive my 44 silver model. I tend to like the older versions of almost all lenses and won't be surprised if the 44 is the best of them all - it's definitely the better looking.
My Tair-11 and Jupiter-11 are also the earlier silver models. I believe they were M39 before the mounts were swapped for M42, so they just miss reaching infinity, but that's okay for me because I rarely use those focal lengths at infinity. The Russian M39, unlike the German, has a registration close to M42, so the mount swap works pretty well, and in fact some people report reaching infinity.
p.9 #6USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
Thank you woodrim. Much appreciated. I was about to bid on a 44-3 last night but decided not to push through. I did bid on an Industar 26 and lost .I have the m42 Helios 44-2. Two of them as my sister gave me their early 70's copy together with a heavy Tair 3. I am on the hunt for a silver version as well. The one with 13 blades.
p.9 #7USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
@ uhoh7, I hear that the Helios 40 causes impotence.
@ cj velez, I have an Industar 61 L/D in route, and I will be looking at the 26 & 69,
I really want a matching set of 40 & 44, and yes with 13 blades.
I'm tempted to go to the former Soviet Union to find them, and some sight seeing would be nice.
p.9 #8USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
Thanks LightShow. Looking forward to some photos from the Industar 61 L/D. What version did you purchased? The black one or the earlier black and silver (panda) type?..
p.9 #9USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
I was wanting the Panda, I thought it would look great on the NEX7, but came across a mint all black for next to nothing, if it does well, a panda will be following it shortly.
p.9 #11USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
cj velez wrote:
Thank you woodrim. Much appreciated. I was about to bid on a 44-3 last night but decided not to push through. I did bid on an Industar 26 and lost .I have the m42 Helios 44-2. Two of them as my sister gave me their early 70's copy together with a heavy Tair 3. I am on the hunt for a silver version as well. The one with 13 blades.
Brgds,
Chris......
Just BTW, if you don't know, the 44-3 is tricky in that some of the mounts are a problem adapting and reaching infinity. I think it is the later mount with serial numbers in the 9xxxx that are usually okay. The issue is a raised lip on the rear mount.
p.9 #16USSR made lens image thread(Helios, Jupiter...)
That's not too bad, I don't normally shoot that focal length with highlights in the background like that, though if I did, I find it more pleasing than hexagons.