fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Archive 2010 · Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Sharpest Aperture

  
 
fraga
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Sharpest Aperture


Canon's big whites don't need to be stopped down for sharpness.
They are all amazing wide open.
You only stop down for increased DOF or decreased shutter speed.

That's why we pay the big bucks for them...



Sep 07, 2010 at 05:04 AM
Cliff L.
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #2 · Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Sharpest Aperture


All lenses are theoretically sharpest at maximum aperture, and lose sharpness due to the effects of diffraction as soon as you begin stopping down. Cheaper lenses need to be stopped own to overcome various aberrations, which usually improves the image quality enough to offset the effects of diffraction until about f8.

High-quality lenses don't need to be stopped down to overcome these aberrations as most of them are corrected in the lens design.



Sep 09, 2010 at 04:46 PM
InternetJunky
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Sharpest Aperture


fraga wrote:
Canon's big whites don't need to be stopped down for sharpness.
They are all amazing wide open.
You only stop down for increased DOF or decreased shutter speed.

That's why we pay the big bucks for them...

My 100-400 needs to be around f/8.0 before I really see the sharpness I'm after, but my 600mm is sharp wide open. White lenses are not all the same.



Sep 09, 2010 at 05:21 PM
schristie11
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Sharpest Aperture


RazorTM wrote:
The 300 2.8 IS is definitely very sharp from f/2.8 to f/11, so it's really up to you how blurred you want your background to be. Shooting in a studio, you probably want things more in focus, so just set the lens to f/8 and leave it there unless you need to let some more light in.


But, would any of them really be that much sharper then a 70-200 f/4 IS when used at f/8, if it's for large DOF studio use only - then why bother?

If you need a shallow DOF lens that is extra sharp, you could also go with the 50 f/1.2L or 85 f/1.2L
Since your in the studio you can move close or far at will.



Sep 09, 2010 at 07:18 PM
schristie11
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Sharpest Aperture


If you have not already done this, then use this thing to check to see at what F-stop lenses are most sharp .

http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/widget/Fullscreen.ashx

This is one of the best tools on the internet.



Sep 09, 2010 at 07:35 PM
NDP_2010
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Canon EF 300mm f/2.8 L IS USM Sharpest Aperture


schristie11 wrote:
But, would any of them really be that much sharper then a 70-200 f/4 IS when used at f/8, if it's for large DOF studio use only - then why bother?

If you need a shallow DOF lens that is extra sharp, you could also go with the 50 f/1.2L or 85 f/1.2L
Since your in the studio you can move close or far at will.


I dont think many people realisticlly use any big teles in a studio, as you said, any L stopped down and using studio light will look good. And i cant see any reason why you would want the perspective of a 300mm lens



Sep 09, 2010 at 08:05 PM
1              end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account