Robb Mann wrote:
My Quadras still weigh a lot less... No-one is breaking any laws of physics right now, but the Lithium VB will give people another price-point to choose from.
I love doing location work with the quadras. It's nice to only have to put a few ounces on top of a lightstand, vs an entire monolight.
I hope someone with more info than I can find on Elinchrom or B&H site and can provide more data. From what I can find, Quadra Ranger AS is 400WS and weighs 3lbs WITHOUT BATTERY, and provides 150 400WS pops from a 3.24AH SLA battery that weighs another 3.5lbs. That works out to 60,000 total flash WS per charge, or 16.7 flash watt hours from a 40 watt hour battery, for an efficacy of 42% . Specified weight for pack and battery, without flash head is 7.5lbs. The head weighs 1.43lbs for a total system weight of 8.43 lbs.
Vagabond Mini Lithium weighs 3.5lbs INCUDING 8.8AH 14.8V Lithium battery that produces 130 watt hours. When connected to an AlienBees 1600 (640WS) it produces 510 pops per charge at the full 640WS . . . 326,400WS per charge, or 90.6 flash watt hours, for an efficacy of 69%. The AB1600 weighs 3.5lbs for a total system weight of 7lbs.
The math says the Ranger provides 16.7 watt hours of flash, at 400WS in an 8.43lb package and the Vagabond Mini Lithium/AB1600 combination provides 90.6 watt hours of flash, at 640WS, at a total system weight of 7lbs. That's 5.4 times the flash energy per charge, 1.6 times the flash energy per pop and 83% the weight.
But these aren't apples to apples system since the AB can operate from AC and the Ranger can't.
I am not comparing the advantages or disadvantages of the two systems . . . only answering the post this replies to.