Ronny Olsson wrote:
Thank K-H
This lens works with tubes and mc-14 and mc-20
I use the lens with all if necessary
Ronny
Thank you Ronny.
I own the M.300mm F4.0, MC-14, MC-20, and some tubes, but I can’t remember have it used with tubes.
You certainly make excellent use of all your gear.
Thank you Ronny.
I own the M.300mm F4.0, MC-14, MC-20, and some tubes, but I can’t remember have it used with tubes.
You certainly make excellent use of all your gear.
K-H.
Sometimes I use tubes for smaller bugs
otherwise not
Ronny
OM Digital Solutions OM-1 + OLYMPUS M.150-400mm F4.5 by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr
Nice shot Tony
Personally, I'm not super happy with the focus stacking when the camera puts the image together .. I think that often there are quite a lot of art effects and also that the sharpness is not always 100%
sometimes you win by taking some of the pictures and using some program to combine them instead, it usually turns out better, or use fokus bracketing instead, but that's my personal opinion
should be added that sometimes it turns out really well too
Ronny Olsson wrote:
Nice shot Tony
Personally, I'm not super happy with the focus stacking when the camera puts the image together .. I think that often there are quite a lot of art effects and also that the sharpness is not always 100%
sometimes you win by taking some of the pictures and using some program to combine them instead, it usually turns out better, or use fokus bracketing instead, but that's my personal opinion
should be added that sometimes it turns out really well too
Ronny
Thanks Ronny, Yes, I know I can get better results by both using a tripod, and by stacking the images in post-processing instead.
However, I am not interested in doing either for better results. I am 30 years older than you and don't have the time or interest in doing either of those.
As I posted on the N&W Forum, what most people consider the best photos has nothing to do with sharpness, noise, or artifacts. It is the subject, or the mood, or the uniqueness of a photo that most people care about:
Imagemaster wrote:
Thanks Ronny, Yes, I know I can get better results by both using a tripod, and by stacking the images in post-processing instead.
However, I am not interested in doing either for better results. I am 30 years older than you and don't have the time or interest in doing either of those.
As I posted on the N&W Forum, what most people consider the best photos has nothing to do with sharpness, noise, or artifacts. It is the subject, or the mood, or the uniqueness of a photo that most people care about:
