rsolti13 wrote:
Luka, even out of your element you sure don't disappoint. I sure like 1 & 3 from the top set and 1, 3 and 4 from the second set. Your very last one being my favorite Excellent work!!!
Just as I get dead set on a Nikon 24 there you guys go with the 21s again.....decisions decisions
Oh, and don't worry, I already have funds set aside waiting for the 35 1.4
@Luka: There's some significant posterization (coloured bands) in your last shot (and a trace of it in the 2nd one). Maybe you should up the jpeg quality a bit. Or post in PNG.
zeissrumors.com, for whatever it's worth, says that AF lenses with either changeable mounts or mount adapters for different formats are to be released. My guess is a prime somewhere in the 180-250mm slot, hopefully APO lens, next. An inventory list from Zeiss-Austria posted on photo rumors.com already listed the 1,4/35 so that long-rumored optic is a reasonable bet too.
AhamB wrote:
@Luka: There's some significant posterization (coloured bands) in your last shot (and a trace of it in the 2nd one). Maybe you should up the jpeg quality a bit. Or post in PNG.
Hmm, I have a calibrated wide gamut and a calibrated sRGB monotor and I can't see any very obvious signs of posterization. I mean, if you look really carefully you can see some traces of it but nothing that at last I would notice without very careful inspections.
The JPEG was saved from Photoshop at 95% quality which should be more than enough. My guess would be that it's more a question of the monitor being able do display the hues rather than the image itself.
charles.K wrote:
Here is in Australia, just about everything that bites you do have to wary of
Hmm, yes... I think you have been holding out on us when it comes to Australian images. I mean, having seen two Yahoo Serious movies and all of the Crocodile Dundee movies, I consider myself to be an expert in Australian wild life and culture. So I feel pretty sure when I ask you: Where are the shots of koalas eating crocodiles and kangaroos and stuff like that?