Paul Yi wrote:
Except for double edge bokeh on certain situations, I don't mind the look of the bokeh from N100/2.8....
N100/2.8 from yesterday....
Very 3d to me (post 25 page 7), like looking through a window without the pane of glass to muck it up. Bokeh is good enough for me too, especially in the last three. Sharp as a tack wide open at f/2.8.
The other post is labeled as 100N, but the EXIF says 50mm, with a shutter speed but no aperture given. Seems like the EXIF of an Alt lens with a chipped adapter on it, like maybe your CZ 100 f/2 I think. (re: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/850075/6#8095489 ). The bokeh does look different/worse in that post, as noted in posts that followed it.
Lotusm50 wrote:
The Kodak SLR/c and SLR/n (I have an SLR/n) are 14 mp. At low ISO, it blows the 5D out of the water. Not sure how it compares to the 21mp Canons, but I would guess that it is not far off.
I've found the Kodak SLR/c has richer/truer colors, much higher edge accutance, a nicer contrast curve - at or below it base ISO (ISO160 is it's base, but it goes DOWN to ISO6). The resolution is very close to my 5DII, with a quality lens. With good light I prefer the files from the SLR/c over my 5DII. The SLR/c files also seem to print nicer.
After seeing the latest 17-35N pics I'm a little disappointed that I sold mine instead of getting it converted. I would have loved to see how it performs on the Kodak and 5DII.
The other post is labeled as 100N, but the EXIF says 50mm, with a shutter speed but no aperture given. Seems like the EXIF of an Alt lens with a chipped adapter on it, like maybe your CZ 100 f/2 I think. (re: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/850075/6#8095489 ). The bokeh does look different/worse in that post, as noted in posts that followed it.
You're right....my bad.
Those were from C/Y Planar 100/2.0 ....
Thank you for correcting me.
I like this one Paul. Looks like you used a milder version of that profile you used in that other thread and got the best of both worlds in this image.
zombii wrote:
I like this one Paul. Looks like you used a milder version of that profile you used in that other thread and got the best of both worlds in this image.
Paul,
Only real difference seems to be just the color.I think you are in the best position to judge.Which of the two seems to show the true color of the building and the sky? That is the one i would go for
-Jim
thanks philber
the third pic is from panyu square at guangzhou, china
you are right, it was a temporary concert scene
they were testing the lighting
christoph
Thanks for posting the images from the 50/1.4 - as I have one out for conversion and hoping it's a keeper. Your images certainly make it look as such - the stage / lighting image is awesome!
Great sculpture shot - it blends in well with the snow & gray light day. Have you ever used that lens at 17mm f2.8? It vignettes a bit but can be composed into the image nicely.
