This topic is in the 2009 archive. You can read it and like its posts here. It is read only.
Archive 2009Contax N Image Thread
p.20 #1Contax N Image Thread
Paul Yi wrote:
...and that would have made me buy the lens 4th times....
I can relate to that
...and that would have made me buy the lens 4th times....
I can relate to that
Jul 29, 2010 at 03:51 PM
p.20 #2Contax N Image Thread
John,
I have both lenses. The N 85/1.4 is designed as a portrait lens which has smoother bokeh than the 100/2 Planar and does not perform as well in the corners as the 100/2 Planar. Although the N 85 can generate plenty of 3-d, I think the 100/2 Planar can render even more due to its less smooth bokeh and sharper transition to OOF at the focus pt. I much prefer the N 85 for portraits and any time I want the combination of narrow DOF with nice sharpness and contrast but also with smooth bokeh. I like the 100/2 Planar for landscapes and times when I want more definition/details in the background bokeh.
The N 85/1.4 is a special lens and like Lotus probably one of the last lenses I would give up.
Paul Yi wrote:
John, I wish I could give you a professional opinion as you always do...
From amateur point of view, I prefer N85 .... it has a bit more of classical look to it, if you know what I mean.....sharp and yet smoother rendering,,,, I think this is especially good for portraits.
It also gives that 3D-rendering, though not so easy as Planar 100....
Somehow, I felt it's easier to get the 3D rendering with Planar 100..... I still don't understand why....
And, AF is definitely a huge plus for N 85....especially for eyes like mine which is getting really bad....
In short, a small...Show more →
I have both lenses. The N 85/1.4 is designed as a portrait lens which has smoother bokeh than the 100/2 Planar and does not perform as well in the corners as the 100/2 Planar. Although the N 85 can generate plenty of 3-d, I think the 100/2 Planar can render even more due to its less smooth bokeh and sharper transition to OOF at the focus pt. I much prefer the N 85 for portraits and any time I want the combination of narrow DOF with nice sharpness and contrast but also with smooth bokeh. I like the 100/2 Planar for landscapes and times when I want more definition/details in the background bokeh.
The N 85/1.4 is a special lens and like Lotus probably one of the last lenses I would give up.
Paul Yi wrote:
John, I wish I could give you a professional opinion as you always do...
From amateur point of view, I prefer N85 .... it has a bit more of classical look to it, if you know what I mean.....sharp and yet smoother rendering,,,, I think this is especially good for portraits.
It also gives that 3D-rendering, though not so easy as Planar 100....
Somehow, I felt it's easier to get the 3D rendering with Planar 100..... I still don't understand why....
And, AF is definitely a huge plus for N 85....especially for eyes like mine which is getting really bad....
In short, a small...Show more →
John Black wrote
Paul, how do you feel the 85N's rendering compares with the Contax 100/2? I didn't see much signs of it when I had one several years ago, but it was also November / December with cloudy, cold weather, so the lens really didn't get much of a workout.Jul 29, 2010 at 05:23 PM
p.20 #3Contax N Image Thread
Kindly post some photos of N85 stopped down to f2 and f2.8. Are they as sharp as the CY100/2 or N100/2.8 since we should be looking at the N85 at its optimum aperture compare to the latter 2 wide open.
And some landscape using N85 at f8 to f11. That will show the versatility of this lens.
I too find 85mm to be too close to 100mm to want to own the 2 focal length (I don't do macro).
And some landscape using N85 at f8 to f11. That will show the versatility of this lens.
I too find 85mm to be too close to 100mm to want to own the 2 focal length (I don't do macro).
Jul 30, 2010 at 12:18 AM
p.20 #4Contax N Image Thread
ManWearPants wrote:
Does anyone who owns the N17-35 still feel the need to get ZE 21?
I've had my 17-35N for a few weeks now and at first was considering a wide angle prime. Now after shooting with the 17-35N, I'm am completely happy with just using it for a general purpose/walk around. Shooting on the 7D.
I probably wouldn't use it on a 5D though as I'm not too fond of the ultra wide look. I have an 11-16 tokina that rarely leaves the house.
Does anyone who owns the N17-35 still feel the need to get ZE 21?
I've had my 17-35N for a few weeks now and at first was considering a wide angle prime. Now after shooting with the 17-35N, I'm am completely happy with just using it for a general purpose/walk around. Shooting on the 7D.
I probably wouldn't use it on a 5D though as I'm not too fond of the ultra wide look. I have an 11-16 tokina that rarely leaves the house.
Jul 30, 2010 at 04:58 AM
p.20 #6Contax N Image Thread
Thanks...
I think this lens, in more capable hands, will shine like no other lens in this focal length...
I think this lens, in more capable hands, will shine like no other lens in this focal length...
Jul 30, 2010 at 01:40 PM
p.20 #7Contax N Image Thread
Paul Yi wrote:
Thanks...
I think this lens, in more capable hands, will shine like no other lens in this focal length...
Thanks. You are showing a lot of good stuff from this lens already. The problem I have with this lens is the price point. This is the 2nd most expensive 85mm (first being Contax Jahre 100years). The ZE 100/2, Ef85/1.2II and even the yet to launch Sigma 85/1.4 is very close if you want to compete on 3D, bokeh and AF individually. Of course you get all the goodness in one lens. Still, I am holding back....
Thanks...
I think this lens, in more capable hands, will shine like no other lens in this focal length...
Thanks. You are showing a lot of good stuff from this lens already. The problem I have with this lens is the price point. This is the 2nd most expensive 85mm (first being Contax Jahre 100years). The ZE 100/2, Ef85/1.2II and even the yet to launch Sigma 85/1.4 is very close if you want to compete on 3D, bokeh and AF individually. Of course you get all the goodness in one lens. Still, I am holding back....
Jul 30, 2010 at 02:19 PM
p.20 #8Contax N Image Thread
Among the lenses you've mentioned, ZE 100/2 is a good competitor....i mean IQ wise...IMHO....
Very sharp and nice 3D rendering....and has Macro ability.
But, as a general mid-tele lens, it's still a bit slower and doesn't have the convenience of AF when you need one...
I do want to try the lens though....saw some nice images on this forum....
Very sharp and nice 3D rendering....and has Macro ability.
But, as a general mid-tele lens, it's still a bit slower and doesn't have the convenience of AF when you need one...
I do want to try the lens though....saw some nice images on this forum....
Jul 30, 2010 at 02:45 PM
p.20 #9Contax N Image Thread
Paul Yi wrote:
Among the lenses you've mentioned, ZE 100/2 is a good competitor....i mean IQ wise...IMHO....
Very sharp and nice 3D rendering....and has Macro ability.
But, as a general mid-tele lens, it's still a bit slower and doesn't have the convenience of AF when you need one...
I do want to try the lens though....saw some nice images on this forum....
Wondering why you sold your CY100/2 and N100?
Among the lenses you've mentioned, ZE 100/2 is a good competitor....i mean IQ wise...IMHO....
Very sharp and nice 3D rendering....and has Macro ability.
But, as a general mid-tele lens, it's still a bit slower and doesn't have the convenience of AF when you need one...
I do want to try the lens though....saw some nice images on this forum....
Wondering why you sold your CY100/2 and N100?
Jul 30, 2010 at 03:54 PM
p.20 #10Contax N Image Thread
I wanted to try Leica M8 .... and I chose those two lenses for financing it.
Still debating whether I should keep the Leica system or not.....
I'm so happy with Kodak SLR/c, and it will become my primary camera.
I still have 1D MkIII, but I'm selling it.
Still debating whether I should keep the Leica system or not.....
I'm so happy with Kodak SLR/c, and it will become my primary camera.
I still have 1D MkIII, but I'm selling it.
Jul 30, 2010 at 04:05 PM
p.20 #11Contax N Image Thread
Contax 50N @ F5.6 -
And F8 -
 |
||
| http://www.pebbleplace.com/offload/Review_Contax_50N/J10_5557.jpg | ||
|
And F8 -
|
||
| http://www.pebbleplace.com/offload/Review_Contax_50N/J10_5570.jpg | ||
|
Aug 08, 2010 at 03:48 AM
p.20 #12Contax N Image Thread
Nice shots! Love the tones, makes the images feel good
Aug 08, 2010 at 04:29 AM
p.20 #13Contax N Image Thread
Nice, John, esp. the 2nd shot. You really have a consistent style of your own.
Aug 08, 2010 at 06:52 AM
p.20 #14Contax N Image Thread
Wow, this thread has dropped to the second page! Need to fix it
Contax N 85/1.4:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4096/4883439544_d2787f8b42_b.jpg
Contax N 85/1.4:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4096/4883439544_d2787f8b42_b.jpg
Aug 11, 2010 at 02:50 PM
p.20 #15Contax N Image Thread
very nice colour, "rdst"
I hope that digital sensor will be good as Provia100F in someday soon.
this image so classic, Andy.
Ataboy, I love to see your pics. thanks everyone
Bump up ,
I hope that digital sensor will be good as Provia100F in someday soon.
this image so classic, Andy.
Ataboy, I love to see your pics. thanks everyone
Bump up ,
Aug 13, 2010 at 09:18 PM
p.20 #16Contax N Image Thread
50mm F1.4 @ F1.4
And F2.8 -
And F5.6 -
|
||
| http://www.pebbleplace.com/offload/Review_Contax_50N/J10_5814.jpg | ||
|
|
||
| http://www.pebbleplace.com/offload/Review_Contax_50N/J10_5813.jpg | ||
|
And F2.8 -
|
||
| http://www.pebbleplace.com/offload/Review_Contax_50N/J10_5785.jpg | ||
|
And F5.6 -
|
||
| http://www.pebbleplace.com/offload/Review_Contax_50N/J10_5768.jpg | ||
|
Aug 15, 2010 at 06:24 PM
p.20 #17Contax N Image Thread
John - nice touch on the 1.4 and cloudless skies.
Aug 17, 2010 at 12:39 PM
p.20 #18Contax N Image Thread
There were some good clouds, but those pix weren't taken with the 50N... This time of year it's very humid with high altitude haze, and the clouds sort of wash into the sky and loose definition. There were some here, but again, they washed out (70-200 IS II @ 200mm) -
This time of year it's very humid with high altitude haze, and the clouds sort of wash into the sky and loose definition. There were some here, but again, they washed out (70-200 IS II @ 200mm) - |
||
| http://www.pebbleplace.com/offload/Review_70_200_II/J10_5676.jpg | ||
|
Aug 17, 2010 at 04:28 PM
p.20 #19Contax N Image Thread
Paul, you have some abnormal looking vignetting in shots 3-4. Using a filter that is too thick?
Aug 18, 2010 at 07:21 AM
