fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2009 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50

  
 
bigalbacore
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


Which lens is sharper and would be better for a walkaround lens.
Also take pics at night parties and night functions. it would be used on D90.
Your thoughts.

Alfred



Nov 11, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Lumen01
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


The 35-70 is a push pull lens no? Just for that fact, I would say the 17-50. On top of the fact that if this is gonna be used at night parties and functions you will most likely want wider as opposed to more telephoto!

Evan



Nov 11, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Jim Casteel
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


On a D90 I would absolutely say the 17-50. 35-70 isn't wide enough on a crop sensor. I had one for a while and was glad when I sold it.


Nov 11, 2009 at 03:29 PM
gugs
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


The 17-50 is really excellent but has a slow focus in a low light environment... for night parties I prefer fixed focal lengths like a 50 1.4 or 85 1.8... or one of the more expensive 2.8 AF-S zooms... The 35-70 2.8 is faster to "lock" focus than the Tamron but you need to get used to the push-pull mechanism. The front element rotates but that won't really be an issue for night photography.

Guy



Nov 11, 2009 at 03:35 PM
Carmen Miranda
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


big,

The Tamron is not only inherently sharp with good color, but their VC delivers another 3, if not 4 stop shutter speed reduction for much "sharper" shots in lower light conditions. The extra zoom range makes it a better walkaround lens too.

Good luck.



Nov 11, 2009 at 03:36 PM
claybrook
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


I had a Tamron 17-50 I used on a D90 and it wasn't that great. It wasn't a 'bad' copy, but definitely not the 'best' copy either - my point is make sure you test it out. For night photos such as you describe, with or without flash, the Sigma 30mm f/1.4 is my favorite lens. It always delivers great results. 30mm might not be wide enough for you, though.


Nov 11, 2009 at 05:09 PM
jonshonda
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


I have a 35-70, and like it a lot. You say using it at night functions, and parties. For that I would really look at maybe a 50 1.8 or 50 1.4. 85mm 1.4? Depends on your budget. You know they say the best lens for DX format is 17-55 2.8. While it might not be in your price range "right now", it could be in a few months?


Nov 11, 2009 at 05:29 PM
ryan stewart
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


I am with the other guy about primes. While I do use a Tokina 16-50 zoom I also like to have primes on me at all times. The Tokina works well when I can use flash or the lights are up but often when the lights run low and/or I am in a venue where I cant get much performance out of flash I love having a prime that can shoot well at f/2.

Although primes are great you will probably be wanting something wider than 35. In tight spaces or with a group you will need something wider.



Nov 11, 2009 at 05:44 PM
nick53097
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


35-70


Nov 11, 2009 at 05:46 PM
curryphoto
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


I found that $ for $ the nikon 24 - 85 was the best walkaround (although better on an FX). Very sharp lens. PS, I have one listed on the BS .....thomas


Nov 12, 2009 at 03:58 PM
cbrandt
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · Nikon 35-70 2.8 or Tamron 17-50


I've a very sharp copy of the 35-70mm .. it's really nice and I shoot it alot on the D700 .. which with that setup is a bit heavy.

I also have a very sharp copy of the 17-55mm also after sending it in to Melville that I use on my D80 that I'm very pleased with .. if it were still on my D300 I'd be even happier !!



Nov 13, 2009 at 03:23 PM





FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account