Travelinbri Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.2 #2 · 8,000$ dream travel kit with these rules | |
Interesting, you've given me something to think about.
Okay, so full disclosure.
I wouldn't say this is my traveling kit, as per I am going on a vacation and decided to throw 8000 into the mix. I am about to rejoin my career as a humanitarian worker overseas, so my travel and work coincide, and I end up some pretty spectacular places. I also take pictures as part of what I do.
I have been saving the last three years (well, two and a half, three when I actually buy the kit come May), and was planning on spending closer to 5,500, but as this is a once every 5 years type upgrade, I started consider spending more. Part of the cost is from selling my previous pretty top notch crop kit, which would net me a few thousand and either selling my FF lenses if I buy into a new system, or using some of these lenses, which I own.
Last time I traveled long term, just after returning from a work deployment, I brought 2 crop bodies and 5 lenses, and I agree, it was too much, but I love the versatility and good results. Truth be told, I would love to keep it to 3 lenses, but I want at least one lens that is WA, one standard, and one long, and I want low light capability. I suppose I could so something like 17-40, 50 1.4, and 70-200, but I use that middle range so much, and the 50 1.4 is so light, I find it hard to make that compromise. And yes, I literally hiked the Himalayas twice with my 4 lens kit (and no, it isn't 20 KG).
I suppose my real question is what do I need to add onto a WA zoom and a standard zoom? I keep wanting to convince myself that I could go just 5Dii, 30D, 17-40, 24-105, and 135L, but then I think about all the range I would miss, and not having a WA for indoor use, which makes me think I should either go 16-35 instead of 17-40, or just throw in the lightweight 50 1.4, and then I think, shouldn't I also throw in the 70-300 for reach? And then I think, rather then 70-300 and 135L, wouldn't I be better served with just a 70-200? And as you can see the thought process goes on....
|