p.1 #1 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
I've got the Vari ND 77mm thin mount that I use with my 24-105L and 70-200 F2.8L IS lenses and have had no issues using these filter with my old 1DIII, 5D or 5DII.
However, when I need an ND filter when using my 5DII and 16-35L II or 24 TSE II lenses, I've been using Singh-Ray's 5 stop 4x6 ND filter. Problem is that unlike the Vari-ND i'm finding a lot of color shifting - especially when used for long exposures (which someone in the General Gear talk section said was a known issue and provided me with a link regarding the issue on another forum site).
What I wanted to know is if anyone has experience using the 82mm Vari-ND (which only comes in a standard ring, not thin), with the 5D mkII and the 16-35LII or the 24 TSE II lenses, as well as how much vignetting should be expected
From what I understand the Duo is only available in 77mm. Any idea how much vignetting there would be with the 24-105L with the standard or thin versions with the 5D mk II?
p.1 #3 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
tsdevine wrote:
I made the mistake of getting the non-slim 82mm when I first got my 16-35 mk II....no go with my 5D. Vignetting was bad on the wide end.
I was able to get a slim mount version, you may want to drop them an email to see if they are ever going to do another run of 82mm slim Vari-NDs.
How is your slim 82mm on the 16-35?
Does anyone have any experience with the 24 TSE and the 82mm Vari-ND
Are there any other options for a good ND filter to use with the 24 TSE II or the 16-35L II lenses As i stated I've got the Singh-Ray 5 stop 4x6 ND filter, however, I get really stong color cast with that filter when I'm using the filter with my 5D II with either of these lenses.
At first I thought the issue was only when I was using a ND grad filter with the 5 stop Singh-Ray ND 4x6 filter. However, I've got the issue when using the Singh Ray ND filter on its own as well.
p.1 #4 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
I have the slim SR polarizer, and the normal VND (since there isn't one that's non-slim in 82mm). When I use the 82mm stack on a 77mm lens, such as the 24-70, it vignettes a bit. When I use it on the 16-35/II, the vignetting is severe. The VND alone is not quite as bad but it is still bad. Here a JPG straight out of 1Ds3 @ 16mm.
p.1 #5 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
I use a 77mm Vari-ND slim on a 24 II TS-E with a 82-77 step-down ring - 1-2 degree tilt - no vignetting even at f3.5. If you shift or tilt over 4 or 5 degrees it will vignette. A 77mm slim will vignette to about 21-22mm on a 17-40. The 24-105 vignettes very easily & shows up to around 28mm. All on FF. It might be nice to have - but - do you really need 5 plus stops of ND at 16-22mm?
I'm not aware of the "color shifting" issue you mentioned using the 5 stop - is it occurring at wider angles - maybe post an image - if your able to provide that link to Gear Forum might be helpful. I use GND's quite often - unwanted color usually is too much filter - underexposure - similar to darkening skies, etc.
Call Bob at Singh Ray - great consultant, product & service.
p.1 #6 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
When I use the Vari-ND on the 16-35 mk II, I'm usually stopped down past f/8. I don't notice any vignetting problems with the 82mm slim Vari-ND. I will say though, for what I like to do...I miss not having polarization. So I also carry around a regular ND and a slim polarizer. Lately I've been using that combo more than the Vari-ND.
It boggles my mind that Singh-Ray isn't producing the slim version any more. Like another poster mentioned, you may want to give them a call and see if they are going to do any "special" runs.
p.1 #7 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
Answering the second part of that question. I know this is blasphemy, but I'm using a Tiffen HT .6 ND and a Singh-Ray LB Warming Polarizer more than my Vari-ND. I've been very happy with that combo. I do suggest using the hood to insure you don't get reflections from the filters. Here's some examples, all shot with a 5D and the 16-35 mk II with the filters mentioned.
p.1 #8 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
stanj wrote:
I have the slim SR polarizer, and the normal VND (since there isn't one that's non-slim in 82mm). When I use the 82mm stack on a 77mm lens, such as the 24-70, it vignettes a bit. When I use it on the 16-35/II, the vignetting is severe. The VND alone is not quite as bad but it is still bad. Here a JPG straight out of 1Ds3 @ 16mm.
p.1 #9 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
tsdevine wrote:
When I use the Vari-ND on the 16-35 mk II, I'm usually stopped down past f/8. I don't notice any vignetting problems with the 82mm slim Vari-ND. I will say though, for what I like to do...I miss not having polarization. So I also carry around a regular ND and a slim polarizer. Lately I've been using that combo more than the Vari-ND.
It boggles my mind that Singh-Ray isn't producing the slim version any more. Like another poster mentioned, you may want to give them a call and see if they are going to do any "special" runs.
-Tim
I think it might be because the have issues (or at least had issues), with the 82mm thin rings. I know I got the thin 82mm Color combo polarizer and was actually one of the individual who called SR to request the filter when Canon announced the 16-35L II lens. However, i found that the glass moves around in the ring. I know they had stopped making that filter for a while as well after the first batch.
One thing I don't understand is why Singh-Ray doesn't work on making thinner mounts like the Hoya HD, B+W XS, Heliopan ES and Rodenstock HR digital filters. All of these filters have very thin mounts WITH front threads so that filter holders/filters can be attached.
p.1 #10 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
tsdevine wrote:
Answering the second part of that question. I know this is blasphemy, but I'm using a Tiffen HT .6 ND and a Singh-Ray LB Warming Polarizer more than my Vari-ND. I've been very happy with that combo. I do suggest using the hood to insure you don't get reflections from the filters. Here's some examples, all shot with a 5D and the 16-35 mk II with the filters mentioned.
http://www.devine.us/img/v0/p143650053-5.jpg
http://www.devine.us/img/v8/p161291774-5.jpg
http://www.devine.us/img/v1/p149620633-4.jpg
Have you tried using the Tiffen ND filters with a ND grad? Most of my issues are when I'm trying to use an ND grad with the 5 stop ND filter.
p.1 #11 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
No, I haven't, sorry.
I haven't had any problems with my 82mm LB slim polarizer either (glass turning) I do expect the sticker to wear down like my 77mm one has, although I've used it probably as much and it still seems okay.
p.1 #12 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
tsdevine wrote:
Answering the second part of that question. I know this is blasphemy, but I'm using a Tiffen HT .6 ND and a Singh-Ray LB Warming Polarizer more than my Vari-ND. I've been very happy with that combo. I do suggest using the hood to insure you don't get reflections from the filters. Here's some examples, all shot with a 5D and the 16-35 mk II with the filters mentioned.
Hi, tsdevine, would the Tiffen HT be a screw-in-type filter? .. do you also need the 0.9 ND or other densities? Any severe vignetting if you double stack them plus a circ polarizer?
p.1 #13 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
Yeah, it's a screw in. I mainly use the combo for waterfall photography and I generally look for cloudy or partly cloudy conditions. There are occasions I need somethings stronger and I'll probably pick up a .9 or 1.2. Sometimes I don't even need the ND as the polarizer suffices. It just depends on conditions. I've been pretty lucky though using the .6 and a polarizer.
If I wasn't looking for any polarization, I'd probably use the Vari-ND. I just don't see an easy way to use the slim (let alone the standard version) Vari-ND on FF and then get polarization in addition.
p.1 #14 · Singh Ray Vari-ND/Vari N Duo with Canon Wide Angle
tsdevine wrote:
Yeah, it's a screw in. I mainly use the combo for waterfall photography and I generally look for cloudy or partly cloudy conditions. There are occasions I need somethings stronger and I'll probably pick up a .9 or 1.2. Sometimes I don't even need the ND as the polarizer suffices. It just depends on conditions. I've been pretty lucky though using the .6 and a polarizer.
If I wasn't looking for any polarization, I'd probably use the Vari-ND. I just don't see an easy way to use the slim (let alone the standard version) Vari-ND on FF and then get polarization in addition....Show more →
Thanks, tsdevine. Oh, by the way, congrats on the voightlander 125mm.
