I look at the "Nude Art" section of your web page and I see some astounding works of art. You have a true talent.
Lately in many of your posts you have taken on the more commercial "sex object" rather than "beautiful woman/person" feel. Intestingly enough, some of your images in the "glamor" section have this same "sex object" feel, but it's a mixed bag. While these images are NOT the “porn” I was expecting (I’m glad for that), they do not have that artistic impact of the work I know you are capable of.
As for the technicals, your lighting is perfect (then again, it always is perfect) and your framing makes for interesting portraits.
Stephen, I know the old axiom "fill the frame", but these are a bit too tight - IMO. Also, the color of her nipples aren't right - way too red. Otherwise, I like them, and I like the lighting.
James Markus wrote:
Stephen, I know the old axiom "fill the frame", but these are a bit too tight - IMO. Also, the color of her nipples aren't right - way too red. Otherwise, I like them, and I like the lighting.
I did not have the room to shoot any other way. I did start the shoot using the 16-35 but shooting wide up close caused a bit too much distortion,
