fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Weekly assignment 306: Overhead
Deadline: August 20th noon UTC/GMT

WA Rules ยท Current entries
  

FM Forums | Weekly Assignments | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Archive 2009 · #356 Green

  
 
JAlexander
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · #356 Green


That's a winner, I'd say! Very creative!


Aug 03, 2009 at 11:16 PM
dancam
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · #356 Green


Not much to add to what has already been said, excellent work


Aug 04, 2009 at 01:28 AM
James Markus
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #3 · #356 Green


Awesome shot, Dave. First thing I thought was "that made a mess"...


Aug 04, 2009 at 09:42 AM
sbkracer
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · #356 Green


Gorgeous image ...

Sorin



Aug 05, 2009 at 08:51 AM
nks12345
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · #356 Green


Now, You are pretty much guaranteed to win you know that. I saw something like that in a magazine with a quarter dropped into water. So if you lower the flash power it drops the length of the flash, and you can still have it timed right. (as in the flash sync)I will have to try that.


Aug 05, 2009 at 01:03 PM
Gh0ztt
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · #356 Green


I too was wondering about the amount of flashes. I have done some experiments with this type of image before and seem to always struggle getting enough light while at the same time ensuring the flash duration is quick enough to freeze the motion of liquid, falling objects, etc. Is it simply a matter of multiplying the number of flash units? Is this better suited to a actual studio flash versus using speed lights? I haven't compared them as I've always used speed lights for their portability but maybe the studio flash is better since it is stronger even at quick durations? Thanks!


Sep 29, 2015 at 11:44 PM
1              end




FM Forums | Weekly Assignments | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account