Thanks for the link. I enjoy the read. But it's rather theoretical. In terms of real world photography, no one has been able to demonstrate a huge advantage when using 14 bit vs 12 bit.
thw2 wrote:
Thanks for the link. I enjoy the read. But it's rather theoretical. In terms of real world photography, no one has been able to demonstrate a huge advantage when using 14 bit vs 12 bit.
Well... I don't know if it's bits that are contributing or not... But my 14bit files certainly have more latitude with recovery of highlights than all of my 12bit bodies. 12 vs. 14 (who knows??) But I like the extra that I get...
Yes, it is a photoshopped image. There are too many shadows and highlights that are identical to the hires canon image available on their website. The lighting of the LCD has been changed, and one or two highlights are changed, but the other 100 or so highlights are identical. Check out the lighting just below the flash shoe, it would be very difficult to duplicate that identically, and the reflection of the lights in the viewfinder are the same as well.
The "ML" button is in playback zone (blue letters), who would need a mirror lock-up when chimping? And with live-view and "C" settings, the dedicated ML button is a pointless feature anyway.
