fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2008 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8

  
 
Paul Yi
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8


Does anyone have any experience with this lens?
How is its optic quality?
Someone offered me a very nice price on this mint lens, but I don't want to spend any money on something I don't know.
Please give me some input on the lens.

Thank you.



Dec 18, 2008 at 04:44 PM
mawz
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8


I've owned one, it's a good performer, but I never did use it on 35mm, only the K10D.


Dec 18, 2008 at 04:57 PM
jcolwell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8


I have the SMC Pentax 28/3.5, and it's as good as my Contax Carl Zeiss Distagon 28/2.8, but not as easy to focus, as it's not as fast. I mention this, as the SMCP 28/3.5 is one of the best Pentax 28's. You can read many people's opinions of all Pentax 28's (and other lenses) at

http://stans-photography.info/

Until a few years ago, you could read another set of Pentax lens opinions & reviews at Alex's BOA Gallery: http://home.att.net/~alnem/html/equipment_review.html, but it's offline, so I'll attach the section on 28mm and 30mm focal lengths, from the file that I downloaded in 1999.

/begin{quotation} ! BOA Gallery

28mm

Rare K28/2 is an excellent performer. Its resolution and uniformity of image quality in all over the frames are very impressive at f/8 or f/11. (Yoshihiko Takinami)

Keep away from M/A/F series 28mm lenses because of their "relatively" poor performance when comparing them to their f3.5 relatives. FA28/2.8 performs only marginally better than its predecessors.

Yoshihiko Takinami has indicated that the best 28mm from Pentax, in terms of its optical performance, is the old K28/3.5. The only two defects in K28/3.5 is its size and weight and some light fall-off towards the corners, which seems better than M28/3.5 or FA28/2.8AL in comparison, but it does exist.

M28/3.5 is also an excellent performer and is compact in size. Go for K28/3.5 when your concern is performance, and go for M28/3.5, or FA28/2.8AL, when your concern is size and weight besides performance. If you are concerned about distortion, go for the K28/3.5 or M. Distortion is under 0.5% for both. Otherwise, the M(or A)28/2.8 is quite nice in terms of weight and dimensions. The FA 2.8/28 is far better, though, but not 100% distortion-free either.

Note: FWIW, there were two versions of the M 28/2.8. The earlier one, with the silver ring on front, was said to be 'slightly' superior. The later version is the 'upgraded' Takumar Bayonet 2.8/28, which now features multicoating. Either one is not as sharp or as contrasty as M 50/1.7 or the M 135/3.5, or the 20-35/4 zoom.

28/3.5 shift lens features good sharpness (a bit less sharp than the K35/2.8), excellent flare control (unless the sun is at the edge of the image), and almost no distortion, although at full shift, there is some slight pincushion distortion barely discernable at the edge.

For additional information about tilt and shift lenses, you might want to take a look at this page.

30mm

K30/2.8 "is excellent optically; it has well-corrected aberrations, very few distortion, very high actual/visual resolution, good color rendition. K30/2.8 is far better than M28/2 [or] M28/2.8 Look here for more info. "[Yoshihiko Takinami]

/end{quotation} ! BOA Gallery

Cheers, Jim



Dec 18, 2008 at 05:06 PM
Paul Yi
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8


Thank you for the thorough info.
I guess I'll pass it then.
I was offered $30, but if with cost of adapter, I don't think it's worth then.

Thank you again.



Dec 18, 2008 at 05:27 PM
mawz
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8


Note that info on the M28/2.8 is not entirely correct. There is indeed 2 versions of the M28/2.8, but those descriptions are incorrect as to the differences and the rarer later version is the better one.

The first version was the original 28/2.8 design for the M series. The second was introduced just before the introduction of the A series lenses when Pentax ran out of parts for the M 28/2.8 and had to put the updated (and improved) A 28/2.8 into production early with an M mount and aperture ring instead of the yet-to-be-announced A mount. Cosmetically it's identical to the A version apart from the aperture ring and mount lacking the A additions. The F version is merely the A version in a new AF barrel. Many of the Pentax primes got a recompute and minor to notable improvements for the A version.

The Takumar Bayonet is based on the M/A/F version, not vice versa. It was introduced in 1984, after the second M version and is a cheapened variation of that design.



Dec 18, 2008 at 06:35 PM
PhotoMaximum
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8


I used to own both the Pentax A 20/2.8 and the A 28/2.8 and found both to be really solid performers.


Dec 18, 2008 at 06:42 PM
jcolwell
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · Pentax SMC-A 28/2.8


The definitive source on Pentax K-mount lenses is Boz:

Bojidar Dimitrov's Pentax K-mount site: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/



Dec 18, 2008 at 07:18 PM





FM Forums | Leica & Alternative Gear | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account