I like the original Bro. Textures are good but I don't feel this one. Also, I try as a rule of thumb to have the brides/girls nose on this side of the photo. It makes this, "softer" and more feminine. The wheat boutinear rocks.
Sam Hassas wrote:
I like the original Bro. Textures are good but I don't feel this one. Also, I try as a rule of thumb to have the brides/girls nose on this side of the photo. It makes this, "softer" and more feminine. The wheat boutinear rocks.
~Sam
Thanks bro! I don't know... I'm just gonna include that one edit in the gallery and see where the cards fall.
What'd you think about the new "watermarking" action?
Sam Hassas wrote:
I try as a rule of thumb to have the brides/girls nose on this side of the photo. It makes this, "softer" and more feminine.
Great tip, Sam. I hadn't heard that one before, but looking at the photo above, I can definitely see where that would improve the scene.
For stuff like that do you provide verbal direction to the couple to reposition? Gee, now I'm curious if couples tend to tilt the same way when they kiss.
tmiller, check the spelling of contemporary on your main page... "I love delivering comtemporary wedding coverage"
So I actually like textures and actions, but in this case, I like the original better. The blue is just so vibrant that I think it makes the picture pop more... the action mutes that a bit. But on many photos, I think it would be a nice finish.
