fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2008 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique

  
 
josh paris
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


Hi please let me know your favs


Dec 09, 2008 at 10:24 AM
AuntiPode
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


The first has an attractive blue sky I like.


Dec 09, 2008 at 05:01 PM
Scott Stoness
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


1, 3,2 in order but 1 is way better than both for me.

1 has nice lines that drawn you eye accross. Very nicely composed. The colors and light blur is interesting as well

3 is good but quite soft and a bit too centred. The headlights here are not as complementary. I don't notice them until l look harder.

2 has less colors and features to not lead you anywhere. Too square on for my taste.

Scott



Dec 09, 2008 at 10:12 PM
Nexius
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


Love #1....


Dec 09, 2008 at 10:17 PM
Bob Jarman
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


#1 followed by #3. #1 has a great visual flow to it...as an aside, maybe clone out the light at the RHS? Great work.

I am curious with a D700 why you set ISO at 250? Also, as Scott Stoness pointed out in a similar thread, f22 brings diffraction into play (perhaps not with a D700?) and you could achieve sharper results ~f11. Maybe my thoughts wouldn't provide the slower shutter speed you needed?

regards,

Bob



Dec 10, 2008 at 08:05 AM
elmoreman
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


I love the first one...it's electric. I'd like to see a little more sky above the streetlight on the right, though. It's a little tight to the framing for me.


Dec 10, 2008 at 08:36 AM
sbeme
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


Like the first best, as well, for the reasons Scott and Bob have mentioned.
2 and 3 are quite dark, have too little on the left to draw interest, and do not make as effective use of the nice lines of light you have captured. First draws you right down the road, cross the frame very effectively.

Scott



Dec 10, 2008 at 08:59 AM
Michael Hill
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · City at Night- WA 321 Critique


#1 no doubt about it, much more eye catching than the other 2.


Dec 12, 2008 at 06:46 PM





FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account