fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
  

Archive 2008 · Should Canon consider this

  
 
Beni
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Should Canon consider this


Given that they say they can halve the lens to sensor distance the camera should be at least as thin as the G9.

What is far more exciting is the fact that we aren't talking about one body here. It's two manufacturers (Leica as well possibly) and a whole line of cameras in the future. No doubt you will get really small ones, bodies with rotating LCD's, bodies with EVF and LCD, bodies with no viewfinder at all - the future looks bright!

I just hope to hell they are content with a p&s type flash and don't try to put a huge SLR type flash housing on it!



Aug 05, 2008 at 12:22 PM
Access
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Should Canon consider this


If they can get the price of the lenses down and the micro 4/3 cameras take good pictures at higher ISOs, it might be worth it, who knows. Right now the P&S models are essentially all the same to me, none of them work well in the ISO ranges I use.


Aug 05, 2008 at 01:17 PM
Jay Adeff
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #3 · Should Canon consider this


Maybe they can finally start putting larger sensors into fixed lens P&S cameras so we can finally get decent image quality out of them above 100 ISO.


Aug 05, 2008 at 01:31 PM
Sam N
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · Should Canon consider this


pat_c wrote:
Sony tried something similar with the R1 and didn't sell very well. I really wish they'd make what you're talking about, but who'd buy it? I use a Sony R1 as my back-up camera, and it works wonders whenever I need an absolutely silent camera, or whenever I need a waist-level finder.


The R1 isn't similar to a micro 4:3 camera at all. The R1 doesn't have interchangeable lenses and it was not designed to be compact.

Micro43 could be like a modern Contax G system.



Aug 05, 2008 at 03:45 PM
rwalls3
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #5 · Should Canon consider this


jvarszegi wrote:
The E-420 is already small enough for you, then:

The m43 cameras and at least some lenses will be smaller.


. I guess it depends on your definition of "not much bigger." I was thinking of...basically same size give or take a few millimeters and grams.

Edited on Aug 05, 2008 at 04:17 PM



Aug 05, 2008 at 04:17 PM
jvarszegi
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Should Canon consider this


rwalls3 wrote:
. I guess it depends on your definition of "not much bigger." I was thinking of...basically same size give or take a few millimeters and grams.


Yep. That picture is with the lens retracted; you specified extended. The E-420 is not much bigger than the G9.



Aug 05, 2008 at 04:45 PM
Stunnaz
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · Should Canon consider this


G9 is kind of big for a non-SLR though. You're not going to fit it in your pocket unless you're Yao Ming.


Aug 05, 2008 at 04:47 PM
freaklikeme
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · Should Canon consider this


I guess I'm not seeing the advantages (but with these massive paws, even the XSi feels like a little toy when I hold it).


Aug 05, 2008 at 04:52 PM
jvarszegi
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #9 · Should Canon consider this


freaklikeme wrote:
I guess I'm not seeing the advantages (but with these massive paws, even the XSi feels like a little toy when I hold it).


Portability.

It must be rough getting through life, unable to hold objects smaller than a digital SLR.



Aug 05, 2008 at 04:54 PM
justruss
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #10 · Should Canon consider this


I would love to have one of these, small enough to fit in a pocket, with a quickish (f/2.0) 24/28/35/50 35mm equiv. lens option. I'd bring one w/ a wide lens everywhere.


Aug 05, 2008 at 05:21 PM
freaklikeme
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #11 · Should Canon consider this


jvarszegi wrote:
Portability.

It must be rough getting through life, unable to hold objects smaller than a digital SLR.


Somehow I manage.

Actually, though, it's not the holding that bothers me, it's the pressing of the tiny little buttons that are approximately a nanometer apart. At least the tiny little buttons on the 5D and 1D-series have some space between them.



Aug 05, 2008 at 05:46 PM
1              end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account