fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
  

Archive 2008 · Should Canon consider this

  
 
dswiger
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Should Canon consider this


Just posted on DPReview.
Mirrorless, 4/3, possible EVF, contrast detect AF.
The line is being blurred between DSLR & P&S.
What would we called?
A DSL, DSLC, ....

Dan



Aug 05, 2008 at 12:26 AM
deeprblue
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · Should Canon consider this


A glorified point and shoot. With interchangeable lenses.


Aug 05, 2008 at 01:01 AM
pat_c
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · Should Canon consider this


Sony tried something similar with the R1 and didn't sell very well. I really wish they'd make what you're talking about, but who'd buy it? I use a Sony R1 as my back-up camera, and it works wonders whenever I need an absolutely silent camera, or whenever I need a waist-level finder.


Aug 05, 2008 at 02:29 AM
EOS20
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Should Canon consider this


pat_c wrote:
I really wish they'd make what you're talking about, but who'd buy it?


Um, Olympus/Panasonic are making it:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08080501microfourthirds.asp


Looks interesting. Maybe this is the future of the 4/3rd format as FF cameras become cheaper, And the competition start to move away from the crop sensors.

It would be a good pocket P&S, With the flexibility of a interchangeable lens system. I know there have been heaps of people asking for a similar product over the years on this forum (And others) So I guess it would be popular, Especially amongst the P&S Crowd.

Can't wait to see more at Photokina!





Edited on Aug 05, 2008 at 03:15 AM



Aug 05, 2008 at 03:14 AM
jvarszegi
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · Should Canon consider this


It will sell like hotcakes. I am sure Canon is very worried about this. It is the most direct assault on their DSLR hegemony yet (even counting Nikon). The "point and shoot crowd" which gets sneered at here is also the largest target SLR market. Most DSLR owners today are parents etc. that would love a smaller camera.


Aug 05, 2008 at 03:27 AM
gml1
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · Should Canon consider this


deeprblue wrote:
A glorified point and shoot. With interchangeable lenses.


Yup. It's about time somebody starts putting larger sensors in P&Ss.
Maybe in these modern day rangefinders the 4/3 sensors will be finally successful.


Edited on Aug 05, 2008 at 03:57 AM



Aug 05, 2008 at 03:54 AM
RalphJ
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · Should Canon consider this


deeprblue wrote:
A glorified point and shoot. With interchangeable lenses.


Yup! When coupled with a larger sensor than P&S's have, that pretty much sums up the "currently-unavailable-camera-that-is-most-wanted-by-an awful-lot-of-photographers" (including me!).

There's no doubt that such cameras are coming; the big question is whether Nikon or Canon will follow Olympus's (and Sigma's) leads.

When the lead technology columnist for one of the most influential papers in the U.S. writes a column for a general audience (i.e., not just photographers) calling for "small cameras with large sensors," it's hard to believe that more such cameras are very far off:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/24/technology/personaltech/24pogue.html?scp=6&sq=Pogue%20SIgma&st=cse

Could be some pretty exciting times ahead for photographers who appreciate the value of big capabilities in a tiny package. I still miss my Olympus Stylus 35mm pocket camera....



Edited on Aug 05, 2008 at 05:41 AM



Aug 05, 2008 at 05:36 AM
Beni
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Should Canon consider this


If they get the lenses right and by that I mean not making super zooms but tiny primes or 2.5X quality zooms and if they make it pocketable with the lens attached it will be very enticing for all those of us who have looked at the ever increasing megapixel counts on p&s's with despair!

Imagine the almost pocketable E-420 with half the depth and without the entire viewfinder assembly, with lenses smaller than the 25mm pancake and a sensor that can knock every single tiny p&s sensor into oblivion. It will be priced cheaply as well, the E-420 is pretty cheap as it is. It could almost make a G9 camera become niche, this will only be a tiny bit bigger. Have to admit that I'm quite tickled by the whole idea. Bet Sigma isn't! This could knock the overpriced DP-1 into oblivion

Edited on Aug 05, 2008 at 05:50 AM



Aug 05, 2008 at 05:46 AM
jam51
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · Should Canon consider this


Reminds me of the very successful Pentax 110. I would be up for a system like this.

http://www.cameraquest.com/pentx110.htm

Edited by jam51 on Aug 05, 2008 at 07:34 AM GMT

Edited on Aug 05, 2008 at 07:34 AM



Aug 05, 2008 at 06:19 AM
dhphoto
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Should Canon consider this


If Canon could bring out a small mirrorless body that took EF or EF-S lenses and had 450D IQ I'd buy one. Rangefinder focusing would be nice too.

David

Edited on Aug 05, 2008 at 06:56 AM



Aug 05, 2008 at 06:56 AM
jvarszegi
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · Should Canon consider this


deeprblue wrote:
A glorified point and shoot. With interchangeable lenses.


Not exactly.



Aug 05, 2008 at 06:58 AM
rwalls3
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · Should Canon consider this


(started my own thread, then saw this one.)

I am pretty excited about this. We may finally have a near pocketable P&S with DSLR performance...

I would buy one along with a micro lens if it was not much bigger than the g9 with lens extended.

What about you? Are you excited? Interested? What do you think of the idea?



Aug 05, 2008 at 07:32 AM
Beni
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #13 · Should Canon consider this


Can Canon do it? I thought the whole point of the system was that due to the far smaller sensor they can build the camera with less lens to sensor distance.


Aug 05, 2008 at 07:35 AM
EOS20
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · Should Canon consider this


It would be nice if Olympus/Panasonic offered external hotshoe mounted viewfinders just like what you find on a rangefinder for those who don't like using liveview for framing their shots.

I wonder how good the AF will be since it's using contrast based AF.

If they price the cameras/lenses right, I'm sure they will sell heaps of them!!




Aug 05, 2008 at 07:45 AM
Stunnaz
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #15 · Should Canon consider this


This is definitely interesting. I like my p&s to be pocketable though... and I'm guessing this is most likely going to be similar in size to the G9, which I find to be an awkward size.

I'm sure Canon will have an answer for it. That's a very lucrative segment...



Aug 05, 2008 at 07:46 AM
Beni
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #16 · Should Canon consider this


Have to be honest I'm far more excited by the opportunities offered by this than the 5D mkII!


Aug 05, 2008 at 07:58 AM
karelg
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · Should Canon consider this


Beni wrote:
Have to be honest I'm far more excited by the opportunities offered by this than the 5D mkII!


+1 I want the High IQ High ISO anytime/anywhere pocketable camera!



Aug 05, 2008 at 08:20 AM
Vern Dewit
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #18 · Should Canon consider this


Yep - very exciting indeed! I love the DP1 for landscapes but a DP1 with tiny lenses for different situations (macro, wider, longer) would be a dream for me. I would keep the 5D for formal landscape work but this EVIL camera would kick __s for travel / hiking photography. Looks like Canon should have announced the G10 a bit earlier. Now I'm not even interested in the G10 till I see this panny / oly offering.


Aug 05, 2008 at 09:33 AM
frank kayser
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · Should Canon consider this


EOS20 wrote:
Um, Olympus/Panasonic are making it:

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0808/08080501microfourthirds.asp

Looks interesting. Maybe this is the future of the 4/3rd format as FF cameras become cheaper, And the competition start to move away from the crop sensors.

It would be a good pocket P&S, With the flexibility of a interchangeable lens system. I know there have been heaps of people asking for a similar product over the years on this forum (And others) So I guess it would be popular, Especially amongst the P&S Crowd.

Can't wait to see more at Photokina!



Micro 4/3 standard. It is akin to buying EF-S lenses - some neat lenses, smaller, allegedly cheaper, and lighter - but one can't put them on 1/3 or ff sensor bodies.

The regular 4/3 lens will fit the micro 4/3 with a 20mm adapter - more or less eliminating the thin-ness of the new body and format. Buy the micro 4/3 lenses, and that's all they will work with.

4/3 promised lighter, smaller, and cheaper lenses - well that has not panned out - I saw the 4/3 Oly lens - 150mm f/2.0 for three grand! - and their 300mm f/?? for over seven grand! Why not just fit the $700 135 f/2.0 Canon to the 4/3 mount and get one of the best IQ lenses going - same for the $500 200 f/2.8. How about a 300mm f/2.8 w/adapter for 4/3 for 2/3 the price of the Oly 4/3 lens?

Maybe the Leica "M" lenses will fit the micro 4/3 bodies w/adapters. Hmmm...



Aug 05, 2008 at 10:37 AM
jvarszegi
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · Should Canon consider this


rwalls3 wrote:
I would buy one along with a micro lens if it was not much bigger than the g9 with lens extended.


The E-420 is already small enough for you, then:
http://www.smugmug.com/photos/282099299_Dipq8-O.jpg

The m43 cameras and at least some lenses will be smaller.



Aug 05, 2008 at 10:53 AM
       2       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account