kakomu wrote:
Whole lotta fair weather fans around here.
Yea, I guess they have increased in popularity in the last few years. I, however, are one of the unfortunate few that has been a fan of theirs for quite a long time now, and had been suffered since the mid-90's when Dollar Bill Wirtz sent everyone that was looking for a raise packin'.
It wasn't that long ago the 'ABC' line was the talk of the team... Those were sad times.
helimat wrote:
Yea, I guess they have increased in popularity in the last few years. I, however, are one of the unfortunate few that has been a fan of theirs for quite a long time now, and had been suffered since the mid-90's when Dollar Bill Wirtz sent everyone that was looking for a raise packin'.
It wasn't that long ago the 'ABC' line was the talk of the team... Those were sad times.
Only during the current season, when they started winning. I went to a game back in 2007 where attendance must have been 15% of seating capacity. Of course, they lost.
At 100% crop there's nothing impressive to be seen, but the local contrast is high and the allover perceived sharpness is better than with most lenses I've tried.
ulrikft2 wrote:
Sigma(tel) (it is branded sigmatel, but it is a sigma) 135 f/1.8 !
(...)
I like it cheap fun :P
Heh. A fading memory comes with age, I shouldn't be surprised. But I should have searched here rather than trying Google, or maybe had should have had a look in Da stupid Index... Thank you!
jan_haidn wrote:
Is this admirable? I like it. Rollei 35/1,4 HFT at 2,8 on 5DII
Nearly everything is "admirable", no worries. What are those triangular shapes in the image?
madamasu wrote:
Here is a picture with the Summicron 50mm @ f 2.8 with the D700 from Fatehpur Sikri in India (...)
Hi Thomas, and welcome,
Hmm, that's not an image, it is a link, no? For everybody's convenience please edit your post and replace the link with a working image popping up. Thank you!
I clicked your link, came to a black page with a link "Fathpru Siki...", clicked that link, came to Flickr, clicked the image, picked a size (1024 on the long side is about max to link directly) above the image and could see the image. Right clicking the image gave me an option to save the image location (Windows, Firefox) and if that URL is put inside an image link here it looks like this:
Maybe the image should have showed up immediately clicking your link, I don't know. It didn't, or I didn't have the patience. Getting the image inside your post from the start make people look at it, it's a better surfing experience, don't you think? I suspect many just don't care to click away and open new windows.
Thanks for the help, Jonas.
Let's see, if I can do it too. Here is a picture of a small bell hanging in ront of a place of worship somewhere in Delhi. Summicron 50mm @ f 2.8
