Here's one from a Rolleiflex 2.8E that has the beginning of lens separation around the outer edge. Shot at 1/500 f16. That's not my current license plate but thought about getting it. Any opinions?
campy wrote:
Here's one from a Rolleiflex 2.8E that has the beginning of lens separation around the outer edge. Shot at 1/500 f16. That's not my current license plate but thought about getting it. Any opinions?
That film was the low water mark in Bond movies... Pierce Brosnan (007) in that movie said he did not think it was a Bond car.
So, unless it is an Aston..
Really fun cars to drive though. I was 'this' close to getting an Z3 M, but ended up with the M coupe. Which I sold a few years later. Which is now worth crazy money.
315hp, no moonroof (rare in those cars), Laguna Seca Blue, that weird tan ostrich pattern leather.
Desmolicious wrote:
That film was the low water mark in Bond movies... Pierce Brosnan (007) in that movie said he did not think it was a Bond car.
So, unless it is an Aston..
Really fun cars to drive though. I was 'this' close to getting an Z3 M, but ended up with the M coupe. Which I sold a few years later. Which is now worth crazy money.
315hp, no moonroof (rare in those cars), Laguna Seca Blue, that weird tan ostrich pattern leather.
Yep, those Z3M Coupes are crazy money if low mileage. I always liked them. I currently have a Z4M Coupe (330hp), also very rare, but not in the Z3M Coupe money range. Plus, I drive mine so not low mileage.
1joel1 wrote:
Yep, those Z3M Coupes are crazy money if low mileage. I always liked them. I currently have a Z4M Coupe (330hp), also very rare, but not in the Z3M Coupe money range. Plus, I drive mine so not low mileage.
Joel
If I still had it, it would have crazy miles on it. I put 20K on it the first year. Stuff like that is desirable with low miles..
The 'new' Lomo Babylon 13 (Orwo DN21) developed in Cinestill DF96 4 min @ 75 degress, 30 second initial agitation, then 10 seconds on the minute with 1 turn @ 30 seconds.
Shot with a Leica M7 and Zeiss ZM 35 1.4. The anti-halation layer is not present, I guess, as you can see glow in the highlights. This can be used to effect for cinema noir feel etc etc.
Images are show in their entirety with no cropping. If I was going to print I would crop out the border and perhaps straighten some...
This image has an accompanying 1:1 crop:
Essentially grain free.
This film is respooled ORWO DN21 but unless ORWO sells it in single 36exp rolls, it would be of no interest to those who don't want to deal with 100+ft of the stuff at a time.
I don't. I only want to buy a few rolls at a time and am happy to pay for the convenience. There are lots of other films I want to use too!
I forgot how much I missed this thread. Not sure how I lost the subscription to it... Beautiful shots...all of them. If I could find some dev chem that’s safe to store, I would shoot more (my dev lab is closed due to COVID, takes many levels of approval to get on campus, even though it’s empty).
The negatives looked thin on this roll, put scanned/printed just fine so I guess just a characteristic of the Foma
400 film which it is.
The next roll developed - Tri-X 320 - had lovely density so no issues with the DF96 getting worn out.
