Post your recent film shots!
p.791 #1Post your recent film shots!
Making the best out of the social distancing situation, I found a deserted park/forest area nearby me with a few nice photo spots. Last week I took my Hasselblad 500 C/M and 50/4 CF T* lens loaded with Fuji Velvia 50 film. Home-developed with E-6 and scanned with Epson V850.
Edited on Apr 05, 2020 at 08:07 AM · View previous versions
Edited on Apr 05, 2020 at 08:07 AM · View previous versions
Apr 02, 2020 at 02:02 PM
p.791 #2Post your recent film shots!
retrofocus wrote:
(Pics)
I can't say why, but fyi, your images only appear when switching from the mobile to standard version. Could it be the use of "frame" vs. "img" tags?
Apr 02, 2020 at 06:36 PM
p.791 #3Post your recent film shots!
Portra 800, T3
For frames taken at larger apertures, I need to find a reasonable workaround downsizing when set to bicubic sharper for the web, but...
For frames taken at larger apertures, I need to find a reasonable workaround downsizing when set to bicubic sharper for the web, but...
Apr 02, 2020 at 06:49 PM
p.791 #4Post your recent film shots!
d.s. wrote:
I can't say why, but fyi, your images only appear when switching from the mobile to standard version. Could it be the use of "frame" vs. "img" tags?
Thanks for pointing this out. I thought the problem was at my end (iPad or Safari) but as soon as I switched from mobile to standard Martin’s images appeared.
retrofocus wrote
(Pics)Thanks for pointing this out. I thought the problem was at my end (iPad or Safari) but as soon as I switched from mobile to standard Martin’s images appeared.
Apr 03, 2020 at 12:52 AM
p.791 #5Post your recent film shots!
1990 or 91, The Blue Angels over Lake Washington with Mt. Rainier in the background. This was Ektachrome shot with the Contax RTSIII and 100-300 lens, a wonderful combination back then. Nikon Coolscan 5000 scanned at 2000dpi.
Apr 03, 2020 at 08:14 AM
p.791 #6Post your recent film shots!
d.s. wrote:
I can't say why, but fyi, your images only appear when switching from the mobile to standard version. Could it be the use of "frame" vs. "img" tags?
It's the first time I hear this, I always upload my photos using the frame indexing. Not familiar with the "img" here. I know that Zenfolio as my web site provider is sometimes slow to show linked images for some reason. It is one major complaint I have with Zenfolio that this tends to be on the slower side.
I just checked on my own cell - I have the same issue. The photos are only displayed on my desktop but not on my mobile phone. I tried a different image size to link to, but it caused the same issue. Currently clueless how to fix this!
retrofocus wrote
(Pics)It's the first time I hear this, I always upload my photos using the frame indexing. Not familiar with the "img" here. I know that Zenfolio as my web site provider is sometimes slow to show linked images for some reason. It is one major complaint I have with Zenfolio that this tends to be on the slower side.
I just checked on my own cell - I have the same issue. The photos are only displayed on my desktop but not on my mobile phone. I tried a different image size to link to, but it caused the same issue. Currently clueless how to fix this!
Apr 03, 2020 at 08:56 AM
p.791 #7Post your recent film shots!
retrofocus wrote:
d.s. wrote
retrofocus wrote
(Pics)I just checked on my own cell - I have the same issue. The photos are only displayed on my desktop but not on my mobile phone. I tried a different image size to link to, but it caused the same...Show more →
Just checking...
You'll want to delete the code around your image url (the "c" and "frame" portions). Then add "img" and "/img" in brackets in their place.
Apr 03, 2020 at 05:36 PM
p.791 #8Post your recent film shots!
What size print will that get you for wall art?
1joel1 wrote:
1990 or 91, The Blue Angels over Lake Washington with Mt. Rainier in the background. This was Ektachrome shot with the Contax RTSIII and 100-300 lens, a wonderful combination back then. Nikon Coolscan 5000 scanned at 2000dpi.
1joel1 wrote:
1990 or 91, The Blue Angels over Lake Washington with Mt. Rainier in the background. This was Ektachrome shot with the Contax RTSIII and 100-300 lens, a wonderful combination back then. Nikon Coolscan 5000 scanned at 2000dpi.
Apr 04, 2020 at 01:22 PM
p.791 #9Post your recent film shots!
The Reala is impressive. Nice images and its in Medium Format
philip_pj wrote:
..
philip_pj wrote:
..
Apr 04, 2020 at 01:24 PM
p.791 #10Post your recent film shots!
From the slide, I could get 16x24 no problem. As to the 2000dpi scan, I really don't know. I haven't tried printing any scans, but it should be able to do the same. I can scan at 4000dpi for a much bigger file and reduce grain. I've been playing around with it and have been able to reduce the blue a bit more and that's more pleasing to my eye. I think that if the image is well focused and a lower ISO film, you can get a pretty large print, well over 40".
Joel
AHPZuazua wrote:
What size print will that get you for wall art?
Joel
AHPZuazua wrote:
What size print will that get you for wall art?
1joel1 wrote
1990 or 91, The Blue Angels over Lake Washington with Mt. Rainier in the background. This was Ektachrome shot with the Contax RTSIII and 100-300 lens, a wonderful combination back then. Nikon Coolscan 5000 scanned at 2000dpi.Apr 04, 2020 at 02:15 PM
|
p.791 #11Post your recent film shots!
d.s. wrote:
I can't say why, but fyi, your images only appear when switching from the mobile to standard version. Could it be the use of "frame" vs. "img" tags?It's the first time I hear this, I always upload my photos using the frame indexing. Not familiar with the "img" here. I know that Zenfolio as my web site provider is sometimes slow to show linked images for some reason. It is one major complaint I have with Zenfolio that this tends to be on the slower side.
I just checked on my own cell - I have the same issue. The photos are only displayed on my desktop but not on my mobile phone. I tried a different image size to link to, but it caused the same issue. Currently clueless how to fix this!Just checking...
You'll want to delete the code around your image url (the "c" and "frame" portions). Then add "img" and "/img" in brackets in their place.
Thanks, but that's a new one for me - Fred's image insertion always uses the "frame" tag, is this outdated now? Was this communicated somewhere? I have never seen the "img" insertion before that this was recommended instead of "frame"?
retrofocus wrote
d.s. wrote
retrofocus wrote
(Pics)I just checked on my own cell - I have the same issue. The photos are only displayed on my desktop but not on my mobile phone. I tried a different image size to link to, but it caused the same issue. Currently clueless how to fix this!
You'll want to delete the code around your image url (the "c" and "frame" portions). Then add "img" and "/img" in brackets in their place.
Thanks, but that's a new one for me - Fred's image insertion always uses the "frame" tag, is this outdated now? Was this communicated somewhere? I have never seen the "img" insertion before that this was recommended instead of "frame"?
Apr 04, 2020 at 02:40 PM
p.791 #12Post your recent film shots!
retrofocus wrote:
d.s. wrote
retrofocus wrote
d.s. wrote
retrofocus wrote
(Pics)I just checked on my own cell - I have the same issue. The photos are only displayed on my desktop but not on my mobile phone. I tried a different image size to link to, but it caused the same issue. Currently clueless how to fix this!
You'll want to delete the code around your image url (the "c" and "frame" portions). Then add "img" and "/img" in brackets in their place.
I've no idea. Perhaps someone can speak to that/those.
Apr 05, 2020 at 06:04 PM
p.791 #13Post your recent film shots!
I've now tried every ISO 400 black and white film available in Australia. This is JCH StreetPan. I can't say that I'm a fan.
Apr 05, 2020 at 07:46 PM
p.791 #15Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
I've now tried every ISO 400 black and white film available in Australia. This is JCH StreetPan. I can't say that I'm a fan.
What developer did you use, or is there a particular one JCH recommends?
I've now tried every ISO 400 black and white film available in Australia. This is JCH StreetPan. I can't say that I'm a fan.
What developer did you use, or is there a particular one JCH recommends?
Apr 08, 2020 at 07:23 PM
p.791 #16Post your recent film shots!
d.s. wrote:
What developer did you use, or is there a particular one JCH recommends?
On the product page JCH suggests a number of different developers including two used by the labs that developed my film: D76 and T-Max. For me the problem is less the development than the film itself—a discontinued surveillance emulsion used in traffic infringement cameras that Bellamy Hunt has “resurrected”. I didn’t say it’s a terrible film, it’s just that I’m clearly not the target audience. I’ve settled on T-Max 400 (TMY) in both 35mm and 120, which should give you an idea of what I prefer.
genji wrote
I've now tried every ISO 400 black and white film available in Australia. This is JCH StreetPan. I can't say that I'm a fan.On the product page JCH suggests a number of different developers including two used by the labs that developed my film: D76 and T-Max. For me the problem is less the development than the film itself—a discontinued surveillance emulsion used in traffic infringement cameras that Bellamy Hunt has “resurrected”. I didn’t say it’s a terrible film, it’s just that I’m clearly not the target audience. I’ve settled on T-Max 400 (TMY) in both 35mm and 120, which should give you an idea of what I prefer.
Apr 08, 2020 at 09:16 PM
p.791 #17Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
d.s. wrote
genji wrote
I've now tried every ISO 400 black and white film available in Australia. This is JCH StreetPan. I can't say that I'm a fan.I'd thought recommending something like Diafine might improve shadow detail, if it's still around, but see that's not the point of this film. I'd stick with TMY2, too.
Apr 09, 2020 at 09:01 PM
p.791 #18Post your recent film shots!
genji wrote:
What developer did you use, or is there a particular one JCH recommends?On the product page JCH suggests a number of different developers including two used by the labs that developed my film: D76 and T-Max. For me the problem is less the development than the film itself—a discontinued surveillance emulsion used in traffic infringement cameras that Bellamy Hunt has “resurrected”. I didn’t say it’s a terrible film, it’s just that I’m clearly not the target audience. I’ve settled on T-Max 400 (TMY) in both 35mm and 120, which should give you an idea of what I prefer.
T-Max 400 is such a great film.
d.s. wrote
genji wrote
I've now tried every ISO 400 black and white film available in Australia. This is JCH StreetPan. I can't say that I'm a fan.T-Max 400 is such a great film.
Apr 10, 2020 at 07:51 PM
p.791 #19Post your recent film shots!
Konica Hexar RF 50mm Hexanon
Nikon F2 50mm f1.4 K
Rolleiflex 2.8c Planar
Shawn
Nikon F2 50mm f1.4 K
Rolleiflex 2.8c Planar
Shawn
Apr 12, 2020 at 04:36 PM
p.791 #20Post your recent film shots!
From a recent trip to Norway.
Fuji TX-1 Pano Camera with Ilford HP5+ 400
Scanned with Sony a7 90MM Macro and Negative Film Lab Pro
Fuji TX-1 Pano Camera with Ilford HP5+ 400
Scanned with Sony a7 90MM Macro and Negative Film Lab Pro
Apr 13, 2020 at 04:05 AM