Thank you very much. No, I am not shooting 35mm. I am using a Fuji GA645, which is from the name, a 6 x 4.5cm film camera.
I do not do the scanning. The photo service that develops my images does that.
Thank you again.
I need to pull out my Yashica Mat and a couple rolls of 120 portra400 from the freezer and shoot some more medium format. My problem is that the only semi-local place that actually will develop c-41 120/220 does a crap job. Bubbles and particles all over it. Just can't bring myself to ship it off somewhere for a develop/scan job (I'm cheap, or rather, poor). I don't mind scanning at home but I figure if I mail it out, I might as well get it scanned. Keeps me shooting 35mm, easy to get processed at walgreens.
corposant -- Nice! Looks like you've been hanging out with Peter. His fingerprints are all over those scans. But it starts with your subject choice and good exposure. Well done!
Peter Figen wrote:
No, I had nothing to do with those. I did do a scan for him last week and it was really a beautiful image. If you ask him nice, maybe he'll post.
At first I thought that was the Culver Hotel, but then I see it's not. Where is that?
Peter -- Your young Jedi apprentice is doing some wonderful work!
Yes, I'd very much like to see this other scan, please, corposant?
Some very beautiful Reala on here. I'm going to miss it when it's gone for good and I lament that I don't have the means to buy up a few hundred rolls for the special times that I want its' color palette. I like the saturation and vividness of Ektar, but there is something alluring about the pastel tones of Reala that none of the Kodak films can touch. I took my family out to a local railyard to watch trains go by as our little one loves watching trains:
But it starts with your subject choice and good exposure. Well done! 
