Post your recent film shots!
p.1495 #1Post your recent film shots!
Alaskan bushplanes. GA645i + Pro 400H
May 17, 2025 at 08:48 AM
p.1495 #6Post your recent film shots!
zi464 wrote:
Canon F1 New + Pro Image 100
Very nice! I love Pro Image 100 for sunny days.
Canon F1 New + Pro Image 100
Very nice! I love Pro Image 100 for sunny days.
May 17, 2025 at 06:14 PM
p.1495 #9Post your recent film shots!
Gold 200
Kiev 6C
Mir 26B 45mm f/3.5
Edited on May 18, 2025 at 10:34 AM · View previous versions
Kiev 6C
Mir 26B 45mm f/3.5
Edited on May 18, 2025 at 10:34 AM · View previous versions
May 18, 2025 at 09:56 AM
p.1495 #10Post your recent film shots!
Fuji GSW690II, 65mm lens, Kentmere Pan 400 @ 1600, Old Df96
Soon to be bought and probably demolished business. Documented for posterity.
Soon to be bought and probably demolished business. Documented for posterity.
May 18, 2025 at 10:12 AM
|
p.1495 #12Post your recent film shots!
Two different panoramas of Marie Lake (10,576 ft) along the Pacific Crest Trail, John Muir Wilderness, Sierra National Forest.
RETO Ultra Wide & Slim, Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400. Three frames stitched in Adobe Lightroom 6.4.
2024.09.20 Roll #363-000036880017-Pano.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Below, I posted the leftmost panel a few weeks ago as a standalone, but it was part of a pentaptych.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes. Five consecutive 35mm frames taken handheld, arranged as a panoramic pentaptych.
Marie Lake Pentaptych by dourbalistar, on Flickr
RETO Ultra Wide & Slim, Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia X-TRA 400. Three frames stitched in Adobe Lightroom 6.4.
2024.09.20 Roll #363-000036880017-Pano.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Below, I posted the leftmost panel a few weeks ago as a standalone, but it was part of a pentaptych.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes. Five consecutive 35mm frames taken handheld, arranged as a panoramic pentaptych.
Marie Lake Pentaptych by dourbalistar, on Flickr
May 18, 2025 at 08:00 PM
p.1495 #13Post your recent film shots!
Some photos from a dance yesterday. It was dark in there; I used my Mamiya C330 with Delta 3200 pushed to 6400 to be able to get to f4 and 1/125. In retrospect I should have shot at 1/60 but was worried about getting too much motion blur with the dancers. I've learned from experience that opening it up to f2.8 on medium format doesn't work for dancers as it's too hard to nail focus. I shot another roll that I'll develop tomorrow after my tank dries, and will develop that roll a little longer (this one was 12.5 minutes in DDX).
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
Bal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on FlickrBal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on FlickrBal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on FlickrBal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on FlickrBal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on FlickrBal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on FlickrBal du Printemps 2025 by Brad Hurley, on FlickrMay 19, 2025 at 06:02 AM
p.1495 #14Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Some photos from a dance yesterday. It was dark in there; I used my Mamiya C330 with Delta 3200 pushed to 6400 to be able to get to f4 and 1/125. In retrospect I should have shot at 1/60 but was worried about getting too much motion blur with the dancers. I've learned from experience that opening it up to f2.8 on medium format doesn't work for dancers as it's too hard to nail focus. I shot another roll that I'll develop tomorrow after my tank dries, and will develop that roll a little longer (this one was 12.5 minutes...Show more →
Has me wondering whether equivalence works similarly to digital, i.e. would you have gotten similar results (also in terms of resolution, etc) shooting e.g. Kentmere 400 @ 1600 at 1/125 f2 on 35mm.
Some photos from a dance yesterday. It was dark in there; I used my Mamiya C330 with Delta 3200 pushed to 6400 to be able to get to f4 and 1/125. In retrospect I should have shot at 1/60 but was worried about getting too much motion blur with the dancers. I've learned from experience that opening it up to f2.8 on medium format doesn't work for dancers as it's too hard to nail focus. I shot another roll that I'll develop tomorrow after my tank dries, and will develop that roll a little longer (this one was 12.5 minutes...Show more →
Has me wondering whether equivalence works similarly to digital, i.e. would you have gotten similar results (also in terms of resolution, etc) shooting e.g. Kentmere 400 @ 1600 at 1/125 f2 on 35mm.
May 19, 2025 at 07:04 AM
p.1495 #15Post your recent film shots!
fjablo wrote:
Has me wondering whether equivalence works similarly to digital, i.e. would you have gotten similar results (also in terms of resolution, etc) shooting e.g. Kentmere 400 @ 1600 at 1/125 f2 on 35mm.
It probably would have been a lot grainier with 35mm; I don't think ISO 1600 would have worked even with a fast lens (I have a few f1.4 lenses in 35mm). The meter reading and thus the range of possible f-stop and shutter speed combinations would be the same for 35mm vs. 120, but depth of field is different and of course resolution is higher in 120 (and grain is usually much less evident).
Delta 3200 is really an ISO 1000 film and its box speed of 3200 is achieved by pushing. From everything I've read, DD-X is the best developer for shooting this film at ISO 3200 and so far it has worked well for me, following the development times in Ilford's data sheet for this film. I also followed the time for pushing to 6400 but the negatives were pretty thin; I'm going to try the other roll at a little more than 13 minutes instead of 12.5.
Has me wondering whether equivalence works similarly to digital, i.e. would you have gotten similar results (also in terms of resolution, etc) shooting e.g. Kentmere 400 @ 1600 at 1/125 f2 on 35mm.
It probably would have been a lot grainier with 35mm; I don't think ISO 1600 would have worked even with a fast lens (I have a few f1.4 lenses in 35mm). The meter reading and thus the range of possible f-stop and shutter speed combinations would be the same for 35mm vs. 120, but depth of field is different and of course resolution is higher in 120 (and grain is usually much less evident).
Delta 3200 is really an ISO 1000 film and its box speed of 3200 is achieved by pushing. From everything I've read, DD-X is the best developer for shooting this film at ISO 3200 and so far it has worked well for me, following the development times in Ilford's data sheet for this film. I also followed the time for pushing to 6400 but the negatives were pretty thin; I'm going to try the other roll at a little more than 13 minutes instead of 12.5.
May 19, 2025 at 07:20 AM
p.1495 #16Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
Very nice! I love Pro Image 100 for sunny days.
Yea, it is very impressive
zi464 wrote
Canon F1 New + Pro Image 100Yea, it is very impressive
May 19, 2025 at 08:58 AM
p.1495 #17Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Some photos from a dance yesterday. It was dark in there; I used my Mamiya C330 with Delta 3200 pushed to 6400 to be able to get to f4 and 1/125. In retrospect I should have shot at 1/60 but was worried about getting too much motion blur with the dancers. I've learned from experience that opening it up to f2.8 on medium format doesn't work for dancers as it's too hard to nail focus. I shot another roll that I'll develop tomorrow after my tank dries, and will develop that roll a little longer (this one was 12.5 minutes...Show more →
Amazing.
They look like movie senses.
Some photos from a dance yesterday. It was dark in there; I used my Mamiya C330 with Delta 3200 pushed to 6400 to be able to get to f4 and 1/125. In retrospect I should have shot at 1/60 but was worried about getting too much motion blur with the dancers. I've learned from experience that opening it up to f2.8 on medium format doesn't work for dancers as it's too hard to nail focus. I shot another roll that I'll develop tomorrow after my tank dries, and will develop that roll a little longer (this one was 12.5 minutes...Show more →
Amazing.
They look like movie senses.
May 19, 2025 at 09:00 AM
p.1495 #18Post your recent film shots!
OregonSun wrote:
Gold 200
Kiev 6C
Mir 26B 45mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54526733235_bd84e507c1_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54526733210_d0743d3156_c.jpg
Luffy in the house, lol
Gold 200
Kiev 6C
Mir 26B 45mm f/3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54526733235_bd84e507c1_c.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54526733210_d0743d3156_c.jpg
Luffy in the house, lol
May 19, 2025 at 09:01 AM
p.1495 #20Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
It probably would have been a lot grainier with 35mm
That's where I'm not too sure.
- 1/125 at f/4 and ISO 6400 is the exact same exposure as 1/125 f/2 and ISO 1600
- DOF and framing would be roughly the same if you use a 35mm f/2 lens on 35mm vs 80mm at f/4 on 120
So the question is whether the resolution from the bigger surface area of Delta 3200 in 120 is negated when it's pushed to 6400, compared to a lower-speed film in 35mm.
At lower speeds (e.g. ISO 400 vs 100) I'd lean towards 120 still being superior. But at those extreme ISO ratings, not so sure.
fjablo wrote
Has me wondering whether equivalence works similarly to digital, i.e. would you have gotten similar results (also in terms of resolution, etc) shooting e.g. Kentmere 400 @ 1600 at 1/125 f2 on 35mm.That's where I'm not too sure.
- 1/125 at f/4 and ISO 6400 is the exact same exposure as 1/125 f/2 and ISO 1600
- DOF and framing would be roughly the same if you use a 35mm f/2 lens on 35mm vs 80mm at f/4 on 120
So the question is whether the resolution from the bigger surface area of Delta 3200 in 120 is negated when it's pushed to 6400, compared to a lower-speed film in 35mm.
At lower speeds (e.g. ISO 400 vs 100) I'd lean towards 120 still being superior. But at those extreme ISO ratings, not so sure.
May 19, 2025 at 02:31 PM