Post your recent film shots!
p.1462 #2Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259714_6eafcb0eef_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259719_c796778054_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401451210_cce7880f03_z.jpg
So, 1970's vintage film? Stored by a furnace? ISO 100? Maybe ISO 100 40 years ago. Scott said give it a stop or two extra light, so I went with two. I actually would have gone with more - because why not it's a complete cr@p shoot at this point - but it was non DX coded and I have a Pentax Espio 24EW that bizarrely defaults to ISO 25 for non DX film.
So junk film - not gonna put that in a fancy camera - in the Espio it goes.
And the results? Psychedelic acid trip man. Seriously far out. I also have included an unmolestered scan so you can see that all I did was adjust curves in LR to increase contrast and saturation. I did not use some lame filter software to completely change colours etc.
This is one of the more 'normal' looking images. Full on trip-meister ones to come.
Unmolestered straight from negativelabpro conversion:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407990695_8180857d5d_c.jpg
Edited:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407617646_0c75bc54f3_c.jpgLove this! Looking forward to shooting the last roll now that I know how much it needs to be overexposed. Been trying to think of the best place to shoot the last roll...Yosemite would be a TRIP.All my shots were in bright sunshine - so max natural contrast etc. I wouldn't recommend it on an overcast day.Did you bring it back to KMart?
I was already in my Hot Tub Time Machine, so I figured why not?
Desmolicious wrote
RoamingScott wrote
Desmolicious wrote
So @RoamingScott@@@@ sent me this ancient, expired, garbage film. Just to mess with me because he knew I wouldn't be able to resist, and waste time and money shooting/developing it.https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259714_6eafcb0eef_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259719_c796778054_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401451210_cce7880f03_z.jpg
So, 1970's vintage film? Stored by a furnace? ISO 100? Maybe ISO 100 40 years ago. Scott said give it a stop or two extra light, so I went with two. I actually would have gone with more - because why not it's a complete cr@p shoot at this point - but it was non DX coded and I have a Pentax Espio 24EW that bizarrely defaults to ISO 25 for non DX film.
So junk film - not gonna put that in a fancy camera - in the Espio it goes.
And the results? Psychedelic acid trip man. Seriously far out. I also have included an unmolestered scan so you can see that all I did was adjust curves in LR to increase contrast and saturation. I did not use some lame filter software to completely change colours etc.
This is one of the more 'normal' looking images. Full on trip-meister ones to come.
Unmolestered straight from negativelabpro conversion:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407990695_8180857d5d_c.jpg
Edited:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407617646_0c75bc54f3_c.jpg
I was already in my Hot Tub Time Machine, so I figured why not?
Mar 24, 2025 at 11:24 AM
p.1462 #5Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
So @RoamingScott@ sent me this ancient, expired, garbage film. Just to mess with me because he knew I wouldn't be able to resist, and waste time and money shooting/developing it.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259714_6eafcb0eef_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259719_c796778054_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401451210_cce7880f03_z.jpg
So, 1970's vintage film? Stored by a furnace? ISO 100? Maybe ISO 100 40 years ago. Scott said give it a stop or two extra light, so I went with two. I actually would have gone with more - because why not it's a complete cr@p shoot at this point - but it was non DX coded and I have a Pentax Espio 24EW that bizarrely defaults to ISO 25 for...Show more →
Looks like oil painting
So @RoamingScott@ sent me this ancient, expired, garbage film. Just to mess with me because he knew I wouldn't be able to resist, and waste time and money shooting/developing it.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259714_6eafcb0eef_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401259719_c796778054_z.jpg
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54401451210_cce7880f03_z.jpg
So, 1970's vintage film? Stored by a furnace? ISO 100? Maybe ISO 100 40 years ago. Scott said give it a stop or two extra light, so I went with two. I actually would have gone with more - because why not it's a complete cr@p shoot at this point - but it was non DX coded and I have a Pentax Espio 24EW that bizarrely defaults to ISO 25 for...Show more →
Looks like oil painting
Mar 24, 2025 at 01:30 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1462 #7Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisy
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpg
Can you explain why your colors seem to ROYGBIV in a circle outwards from the center, while mine were top to bottom in straight lines?
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisy
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpg
Can you explain why your colors seem to ROYGBIV in a circle outwards from the center, while mine were top to bottom in straight lines?
Mar 24, 2025 at 02:26 PM
p.1462 #8Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisy
Those really are psychedelic! Reminds me of what sometimes happens on the first shot of a roll of (unexpired) Kodak Aerocolor if I haven't bothered to load the film in the dark -- this was shot with my Mamiya C330.
Inuit art with light piping by Brad Hurley, on Flickr
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisy
Those really are psychedelic! Reminds me of what sometimes happens on the first shot of a roll of (unexpired) Kodak Aerocolor if I haven't bothered to load the film in the dark -- this was shot with my Mamiya C330.
Inuit art with light piping by Brad Hurley, on FlickrMar 24, 2025 at 02:32 PM
p.1462 #9Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisy
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpg
This makes 135 Iford Phoenix look like Portra 160!
Mar 24, 2025 at 02:54 PM
p.1462 #10Post your recent film shots!
RoamingScott wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpgCan you explain why your colors seem to ROYGBIV in a circle outwards from the center, while mine were top to bottom in straight lines?
Maybe how I 'scanned' the film?
I used (as I always do) a Nikon ES-2 film copier attached to a 60mm Macro lens on my Z7, and hand held it over an led light pad.
This is how I scan all my 35mm film, I didn't do anything differently on this roll.
I used a Pentax Espio 24EW p&s camera. Not sure if the lens on that had any effect.
Desmolicious wrote
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisyhttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpg
Maybe how I 'scanned' the film?
I used (as I always do) a Nikon ES-2 film copier attached to a 60mm Macro lens on my Z7, and hand held it over an led light pad.
This is how I scan all my 35mm film, I didn't do anything differently on this roll.
I used a Pentax Espio 24EW p&s camera. Not sure if the lens on that had any effect.
Mar 24, 2025 at 02:54 PM
|
p.1462 #11Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpgThis makes 135 Iford Phoenix look like Portra 160!
The one thing about this 'Kmart' film is it actually was very sharp. Way way sharper than Phoenix.
Desmolicious wrote
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisyhttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpg
The one thing about this 'Kmart' film is it actually was very sharp. Way way sharper than Phoenix.
Mar 24, 2025 at 02:56 PM
p.1462 #12Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpgThis makes 135 Iford Phoenix look like Portra 160!The one thing about this 'Kmart' film is it actually was very sharp. Way way sharper than Phoenix.
That looks a lot like a 1970's cassette. Kodak started using DX in the early 1980's. Are there any edge markings? I'm guessing it's GAF.
madNbad wrote
Desmolicious wrote
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisyhttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpg
That looks a lot like a 1970's cassette. Kodak started using DX in the early 1980's. Are there any edge markings? I'm guessing it's GAF.
Mar 24, 2025 at 03:35 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1462 #13Post your recent film shots!
The roll expired in 84 fwiw.
madNbad wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpgThis makes 135 Iford Phoenix look like Portra 160!The one thing about this 'Kmart' film is it actually was very sharp. Way way sharper than Phoenix.That looks a lot like a 1970's cassette. Kodak started using DX in the early 1980's. Are there any edge markings? I'm guessing it's GAF.
madNbad wrote:
Desmolicious wrote
madNbad wrote
Desmolicious wrote
And of course, Daisy Belle McGuttley aka Chunkalita aka Dingleberry Daisyhttps://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54407917398_d8ed0224b3_b.jpg
Mar 24, 2025 at 03:36 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1462 #14Post your recent film shots!
Mar 24, 2025 at 03:41 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1462 #16Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Hit the "Buy it Now" You're a bad influence.
Looks like it also had an 84 expiry. Hopefully yours was also stored in a Texas garage for 40 years.
Hit the "Buy it Now" You're a bad influence.
Looks like it also had an 84 expiry. Hopefully yours was also stored in a Texas garage for 40 years.
Mar 24, 2025 at 03:50 PM
p.1462 #17Post your recent film shots!
RoamingScott wrote:
Looks like it also had an 84 expiry. Hopefully yours was also stored in a Texas garage for 40 years.
Maybe near Huston, just to add the humidity effect.
Looks like it also had an 84 expiry. Hopefully yours was also stored in a Texas garage for 40 years.
Maybe near Huston, just to add the humidity effect.
Mar 24, 2025 at 03:57 PM
RoamingScott
Offline
Activity
[X]
Details
p.1462 #18Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Maybe near Huston, just to add the humidity effect.
Rainbows AND ripples!
RoamingScott wrote
Looks like it also had an 84 expiry. Hopefully yours was also stored in a Texas garage for 40 years.Rainbows AND ripples!
Mar 24, 2025 at 03:58 PM
p.1462 #20Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
And the results? Psychedelic acid trip man. Seriously far out. I also have included an unmolestered scan so you can see that all I did was adjust curves in LR to increase contrast and saturation. I did not use some lame filter software to completely change colours etc.
This is one of the more 'normal' looking images. Full on trip-meister ones to come.
Reminds of my college days
And the results? Psychedelic acid trip man. Seriously far out. I also have included an unmolestered scan so you can see that all I did was adjust curves in LR to increase contrast and saturation. I did not use some lame filter software to completely change colours etc.
This is one of the more 'normal' looking images. Full on trip-meister ones to come.
Reminds of my college days
Mar 24, 2025 at 05:35 PM