Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
bjhurley wrote:
Actually I remember Trent Parke did something like this, cropping tiny bits of 35mm photos and enlarging them so they were all grain with no detail:
bjhurley wrote:
Actually I remember Trent Parke did something like this, cropping tiny bits of 35mm photos and enlarging them so they were all grain with no detail:
rji2goleez wrote:
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
That Lucky film looks really nice, and excellent results from the Samsung as always!
At my local shop they have a perfect condition Olympus Stylus 35-70. I played with it a little, then saw the lens is a 4.5 at 35mm. Then reminded myself the Samsung which I already have has a faster lens, more features and is great!
And I paid $20-ish for it vs the $100 the shop was asking.
Desmolicious wrote:
That Lucky film looks really nice, and excellent results from the Samsung as always!
At my local shop they have a perfect condition Olympus Stylus 35-70. I played with it a little, then saw the lens is a 4.5 at 35mm. Then reminded myself the Samsung which I already have has a faster lens, more features and is great!
And I paid $20-ish for it vs the $100 the shop was asking.
That's just it. $20 is hard to beat. I tried one other P&S and it can't beat the Samsung.
