Post your recent film shots!
p.1428 #1Post your recent film shots!
F2, WLF, 24 2.8, Phoenix @ 100
Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
100% crop from above:
Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
100% crop from above:
Feb 05, 2025 at 11:41 AM
p.1428 #2Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
F2, WLF, 24 2.8, Phoenix @ 100
Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54309303620_388ddbf13b_b.jpg
100% crop from above:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54308878261_bbf8a2d10f_b.jpg
Pretend you're Georges Surat. Print it big and call it "Pointillism."
Or just show it on you're phone so no one can see the grain.
F2, WLF, 24 2.8, Phoenix @ 100
Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54309303620_388ddbf13b_b.jpg
100% crop from above:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54308878261_bbf8a2d10f_b.jpg
Pretend you're Georges Surat. Print it big and call it "Pointillism."
Or just show it on you're phone so no one can see the grain.
Feb 05, 2025 at 12:09 PM
p.1428 #3Post your recent film shots!
lifeandmylens wrote:
Starting her young. F3 + 58/1.2 + 250D
Get her a Camp Snap. The images would be fun to see, they don't cost much and Huss has gotten some good pictures from his.
Starting her young. F3 + 58/1.2 + 250D
Get her a Camp Snap. The images would be fun to see, they don't cost much and Huss has gotten some good pictures from his.
Feb 05, 2025 at 12:25 PM
p.1428 #4Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54309303620_388ddbf13b_b.jpg
100% crop from above:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54308878261_bbf8a2d10f_b.jpgPretend you're Georges Surat. Print it big and call it "Pointillism."
Or just show it on you're phone so no one can see the grain.
There definitely is a use case scenario for this film where, as you say, you can do the Surat thing.
Just be aware of the 'qualities' of this film!
And if you see crazy colours - it's not the film, it's whoever scanned it did not bother to use the correct profile.
Desmolicious wrote
F2, WLF, 24 2.8, Phoenix @ 100Example of the lack of sharpness and large grain of Phoenix 200 (shot at 100).
This was at f8, where the 24 2.8 AI-S would show very fine detail with films like Fojak 200, 400 etc.
I still like Harman Phoenix, but it definitely is a work in progress which Harman readily admits to.
In 120 form, all this is masked just by the fact the negative is so much bigger.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54309303620_388ddbf13b_b.jpg
100% crop from above:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54308878261_bbf8a2d10f_b.jpg
Or just show it on you're phone so no one can see the grain.
There definitely is a use case scenario for this film where, as you say, you can do the Surat thing.
Just be aware of the 'qualities' of this film!
And if you see crazy colours - it's not the film, it's whoever scanned it did not bother to use the correct profile.
Feb 05, 2025 at 12:28 PM
p.1428 #6Post your recent film shots!
madNbad wrote:
Pretend you're Georges Surat. Print it big and call it "Pointillism."
Actually I remember Trent Parke did something like this, cropping tiny bits of 35mm photos and enlarging them so they were all grain with no detail:
https://www.magnumphotos.com/theory-and-practice/trent-parke-the-camera-is-god/
Pretend you're Georges Surat. Print it big and call it "Pointillism."
Actually I remember Trent Parke did something like this, cropping tiny bits of 35mm photos and enlarging them so they were all grain with no detail:
https://www.magnumphotos.com/theory-and-practice/trent-parke-the-camera-is-god/
Feb 05, 2025 at 01:36 PM
p.1428 #7Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
madNbad wrote
Pretend you're Georges Surat. Print it big and call it "Pointillism."https://www.magnumphotos.com/theory-and-practice/trent-parke-the-camera-is-god/
I’ve had the same results developing Tri-X in Rodinal.
Feb 05, 2025 at 01:42 PM
p.1428 #8Post your recent film shots!
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Feb 05, 2025 at 02:34 PM
p.1428 #9Post your recent film shots!
bjhurley wrote:
Actually I remember Trent Parke did something like this, cropping tiny bits of 35mm photos and enlarging them so they were all grain with no detail:
https://www.magnumphotos.com/theory-and-practice/trent-parke-the-camera-is-god/
Byrne, Surat and now Parke?
I honestly appreciate the education I am getting from fellow FMrs!
madNbad wrote
Pretend you're Georges Surat. Print it big and call it "Pointillism."https://www.magnumphotos.com/theory-and-practice/trent-parke-the-camera-is-god/
Byrne, Surat and now Parke?
I honestly appreciate the education I am getting from fellow FMrs!
Feb 05, 2025 at 03:39 PM
p.1428 #10Post your recent film shots!
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Feb 05, 2025 at 03:57 PM
|
p.1428 #11Post your recent film shots!
Addiction Aquatic Development, Zhongshan District, Taipei City.
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.11.26 Roll #345-08449-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Nikon FM2n, AI Nikkor 50mm f/1.8S, Kentmere Pan 400, developed in LegacyPro L110 at 1:31 for 5.5 minutes.
2023.11.26 Roll #345-08449-positive.jpg by dourbalistar, on Flickr
Feb 05, 2025 at 06:00 PM
p.1428 #12Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
That Lucky film looks really nice, and excellent results from the Samsung as always!
At my local shop they have a perfect condition Olympus Stylus 35-70. I played with it a little, then saw the lens is a 4.5 at 35mm. Then reminded myself the Samsung which I already have has a faster lens, more features and is great!
And I paid $20-ish for it vs the $100 the shop was asking.
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
That Lucky film looks really nice, and excellent results from the Samsung as always!
At my local shop they have a perfect condition Olympus Stylus 35-70. I played with it a little, then saw the lens is a 4.5 at 35mm. Then reminded myself the Samsung which I already have has a faster lens, more features and is great!
And I paid $20-ish for it vs the $100 the shop was asking.
Feb 05, 2025 at 06:54 PM
p.1428 #13Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
Lucky SHD 400
D-76That Lucky film looks really nice, and excellent results from the Samsung as always!
At my local shop they have a perfect condition Olympus Stylus 35-70. I played with it a little, then saw the lens is a 4.5 at 35mm. Then reminded myself the Samsung which I already have has a faster lens, more features and is great!
And I paid $20-ish for it vs the $100 the shop was asking.
That's just it. $20 is hard to beat. I tried one other P&S and it can't beat the Samsung.
rji2goleez wrote
Samsung AF Slim ZoomLucky SHD 400
D-76
At my local shop they have a perfect condition Olympus Stylus 35-70. I played with it a little, then saw the lens is a 4.5 at 35mm. Then reminded myself the Samsung which I already have has a faster lens, more features and is great!
And I paid $20-ish for it vs the $100 the shop was asking.
That's just it. $20 is hard to beat. I tried one other P&S and it can't beat the Samsung.
Feb 05, 2025 at 09:08 PM
p.1428 #17Post your recent film shots!
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Feb 06, 2025 at 07:18 AM
p.1428 #18Post your recent film shots!
Desmolicious wrote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54306664372_1910d2ae6f_b.jpgI love photos like this. Very George Byrne!!
If you don't know Georges work, Google him. His sister is the actress Rose Byrne. Talented family!I looked up George Burns and am now very confused.
At first I was confused, but I just re-read your response, and I now see that you were making a joke. haha
Activatedfx wrote
Desmolicious wrote
F2, WLF, 24 2.8 AI-S, Phoenix @ 100https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/54306664372_1910d2ae6f_b.jpg
If you don't know Georges work, Google him. His sister is the actress Rose Byrne. Talented family!
At first I was confused, but I just re-read your response, and I now see that you were making a joke. haha
Feb 06, 2025 at 09:10 AM
p.1428 #20Post your recent film shots!
rji2goleez wrote:
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Love the simplicity of this one.
Samsung AF Slim Zoom
Lucky SHD 400
D-76
Love the simplicity of this one.
Feb 06, 2025 at 09:35 AM