Got my first photos from the Fuji Work Record today (thanks again to Huss for recommending this camera!).
The Fuji Work Record was bred and born for documenting construction sites, and mine reacts to orange cones, excavators, and backhoes the same way a border collie reacts to a flock of sheep or a gang of young schoolchildren. As we walked past this construction site the camera forced itself into my hands, raised itself to my eye, and willed my right index finger to press the shutter button. And look at that, I not only documented a construction site, but managed to capture a cat and a deer(e) in the same frame.
Some other snapshots below. I shot Ultramax 400 for this roll, a film I've never used before, and tried to stress-test both the camera and film to get a sense of their limitations.
bjhurley wrote:
Got my first photos from the Fuji Work Record today (thanks again to Huss for recommending this camera!).
The Fuji Work Record was bred and born for documenting construction sites, and mine reacts to orange cones, excavators, and backhoes the same way a border collie reacts to a flock of sheep or a gang of young schoolchildren. As we walked past this construction site the camera forced itself into my hands, raised itself to my eye, and willed my right index finger to press the shutter button. And look at that, I not only documented a construction site, but managed to capture a cat and a deer(e) in the same frame.
Some other snapshots below. I shot Ultramax 400 for this roll, a film I've never used before, and tried to stress-test both the camera and film to get a sense of their limitations.
I've been tweaking my development process and testing different things and this roll got under processed. The negative was quite thin, but the scan turned out better than I was expecting when I saw the negative.
Restaurant snap. Pentax 67II + 75 AL + Kodak 500T.
lifeandmylens wrote:
I've been tweaking my development process and testing different things and this roll got under processed. The negative was quite thin, but the scan turned out better than I was expecting when I saw the negative.
Restaurant snap. Pentax 67II + 75 AL + Kodak 500T.
Restaurant snap using a Pentax 67II?
"Honey, did you get the diaper bag?
"No baby, my hands are full. Do you mind grabbing it? And the kids? And their toys?"
lifeandmylens wrote:
I've been tweaking my development process and testing different things and this roll got under processed. The negative was quite thin, but the scan turned out better than I was expecting when I saw the negative.
Restaurant snap. Pentax 67II + 75 AL + Kodak 500T.
I just want to thank you for posting good examples of 500T. I have been struggling to find many images that aren't taken in broad daylight.
skylight1b wrote:
I just want to thank you for posting good examples of 500T. I have been struggling to find many images that aren't taken in broad daylight.
When I first started with vision 3 films it was my least favorite. It's now my favorite. Great speed for low lighting and quite flexible.
