Our bi-weekly fight against the scourge of evaporative loss (i.e. barrel topping). We have to add wine back to the barrels every 14-ish days to limit headspace (the oxygen in which is deleterious to the wine). We have 15.5 gallon kegs that we pressurize with nitrogen gas to push through a hose and out the topping gun.
bestdayz wrote:
this film has terrible reciprocity I learned and tough to scan
dust probably improves image lol
What did you rate the film at? Fomapan 400/Arista400 is not a 400 speed film (even though they decided to market it as such). I find it works best being rated between 160 and 200.
The thin base of the 120 version can make it feel really fiddly for scanning. Oddly, the 35mm is a more ‘normal’ thickness (and it dries flat).
Took a road trip to see family and decided to take the "avoid highways" route. Added 2 hours to the trip, but was much more enjoyable than pure highway. Saw tons of old cars, here is one of them. G2 + 28/2 + Portra 160
_jim_ wrote:
What did you rate the film at? Fomapan 400/Arista400 is not a 400 speed film (even though they decided to market it as such). I find it works best being rated between 160 and 200.
Same here -- I usually rate it at 200; tried 400 and 320 and it was always underexposed and muddy. I'll try 160 next! I have a roll of it in 120 that I haven't used yet; reportedly the 120 film, which has a polyester base, has more halation than the 35mm so I'd like to see if I can exploit that.
lifeandmylens wrote:
Took a road trip to see family and decided to take the "avoid highways" route. Added 2 hours to the trip, but was much more enjoyable than pure highway. Saw tons of old cars, here is one of them. G2 + 28/2 + Portra 160
