Minolta Hi-Matic E + Fuji 200 ( new ver )
The lens is still very sharp.
IMO is too yellowish. Fuji 200 ( new ver ) just like that ? the espouse issue ( can't adjust anything since automatic exposure ) ? scan issue ?
zi464 wrote:
Minolta Hi-Matic E + Fuji 200 ( new ver )
The lens is still very sharp.
IMO is too yellowish. Fuji 200 ( new ver ) just like that ? the espouse issue ( can't adjust anything since automatic exposure ) ? scan issue ?
Looks like Kodak Gold to me, but I am new at this again... New Fuji 200 is Kodak Gold so that seems right to my eyes.
Also, I have a Minolta like yours, but the film advance lever is frozen so it's a decoration now. :-(
zi464 wrote:
Minolta Hi-Matic E + Fuji 200 ( new ver )
The lens is still very sharp.
IMO is too yellowish. Fuji 200 ( new ver ) just like that ? the espouse issue ( can't adjust anything since automatic exposure ) ? scan issue ?
geekcop wrote:
Looks like Kodak Gold to me, but I am new at this again... New Fuji 200 is Kodak Gold so that seems right to my eyes.
Also, I have a Minolta like yours, but the film advance lever is frozen so it's a decoration now. :-(
It's my first time shoot with new Fuji 200.
Yea I noticed it is Kodak gold from YouTube and internet before I shoot, but just feel more yellow when I compare to the pic I took with F3 + gold 200 https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1849151
zi464 wrote:
Yea, I just got the roll scan today and the whole roll must in LR to edit
But man the lens is so sharp at his age
Yeah, it certainly looks good! There's typically a lot of life in old glass.
If you have PS, I personally find the color balance tool to be quicker to work with when correcting lab scans specifically. My lab's scans look a lot like yours, and they pretty much always need more cyan and magenta in the shadows and midtones to balance out. Exposure and gamma just help to brighten up what otherwise would be a somewhat flat scan.
