fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              end
  

Archive 2008 · Good D300 kit?

  
 
Spydweb
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #1 · Good D300 kit?


Rodolfo Paiz wrote[/

Moving systems (C-to-N or N-to-C) is not just about changing your gear. You also have to change a fair amount of how you think, how you shoot, and how you process.


You are so right. Also some good tips,


Edited by Spydweb on May 31, 2008 at 12:55 PM GMT

Edited on May 31, 2008 at 01:55 PM



May 31, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Jammy Straub
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #2 · Good D300 kit?


Spydweb wrote:
Jammy, I know you are right, there are many great things about the D300, great autofocus being #1 for me.. It just seems to have a bigger learning curve than I expected.



I can definitely agree there, it's a very deep camera to get to know!



May 31, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Rodolfo Paiz
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #3 · Good D300 kit?


To answer the original poster's question and comment on some other stuff:

For a D300, my main two lenses are the 17-55 and 70-200. I do not use the 24-70 because it's bigger/heavier and the 17-55 range is more useful on DX. I don't shoot wide too often, and the Tokina 12-24/4 has been more-than-good-enough for me in that range. If you shoot a lot more in that range, the Nikon 12-24 does seem reputed to have better IQ and lower flare/CA issues. Tokina good, Nikon better.

I love my 105VR macro, great lens. Choosing between Nikon's macro lenses is a study in cost and working distance only... they're all great. Buy what will give you the working distance you need at a cost you can afford, and be done with it.

For low light, I have the Nikon 50/1.4 and the Sigma 30/1.4. Pleased with both so far, though I use them very little and so can't fully report on quality.

Lastly, I'd comment that the 70-200 tolerates 1.4x and 1.7x TC's (the new version) extremely well. In a pinch, those provide a cheap and good-quality way to get a 105-320/4.8 lens that will cover even daylight sports needs with aplomb.

Re the DX/FX issue: I believe DX and FX will both be here for a long time, just like MF and LF still are. Nothing and no one says we all have to use the same sensor size. I don't buy a minivan instead of a sports car just because I might have four kids someday, so I see no reason to buy lenses because I might buy another sensor-size body someday. Buy the best for your needs and gear today, I say.

Peace out.



May 31, 2008 at 01:56 PM
nanana
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #4 · Good D300 kit?


I switched from Canon and have started to build up Nikon set as follow.
70-200 VR, 18-200 VR, 85 1.8D, 50 1.8

and need to get soon...
50 1.4D to replace 1.8, and 28-70 2.8D or 17-35 2.8D.





May 31, 2008 at 05:21 PM
Blimey
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #5 · Good D300 kit?


still too slow to stop kids jumping in the air. i learned this today after a shoot.
but good lense...



Jun 01, 2008 at 01:17 AM
MagicNikon
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #6 · Good D300 kit?


Go check out Thom Hogans latest article on his site. He seems to like the D300 combo this way: 12-24mm DX, 24-70mm 2.8 and 70-200mm VR.

I can't say that I disagree, the 12-24 is a nice lens, althoug IMO a bit overpriced.



Jun 01, 2008 at 07:43 AM
gregjrandall
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #7 · Good D300 kit?


The Habs & The Canucks?? Which planet?
Suggest the following (wish I had):

AFS-Nikkor 14-24 mm f/2.8 ED-IF FX = 21-36mm on the D300! - Expression Unlimited!
AF-Nikkor 85 mm f/1.4 D IF = 127mm on the D300! - "Up There and Personal" lens.

These are great, great lenses and don't need anything between apart from a couple of paces.

Good luck!



Jun 01, 2008 at 09:20 AM
1       2       3              end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account