fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
  

Archive 2007 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift

  
 
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #1 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


[EDIT: I just got a reply from Canon that this is known and that it will be addressed in a firmare update soon.]

Ok, I thought this may be a useful feature. So I set the camera to f2 being the widest aperture, set Tv to 1/100s, and turned on SS via ISO. Then I proceeded to shoot my daughter, at 5fps, just for fun.

For most of the images the camera chose ISO 1600. Fine. Then there was this sequence of three images, all taken back to back, within one second as part of a burst. The camera switched from 1250 (the last image before this sequence) to 1000 to 1250 to 1600. The result was ... well, astonishing. I am including the 100% crops of the "Small" in-camera JPGs, but when you look at the raws the problem is there, too. The first image (when the sensor switched from 1250 to 1000) has severe banding, the 2nd one is at 1250 again and looks fine (for how pathetic the light was), and the 3rd 1600 shot is ... well, black.

Looks like the sensor doesn't like being cycled in sensitivity very rapidly. If that's the case, why does the camera allow this? Personally I'd rather have an improperly exposed image than this.

1/100s, f2.0, 1000:
http://fm.jirman.com/ISO-SS/1.jpg
1/100s, f2.3, 1250:
http://fm.jirman.com/ISO-SS/2.jpg
1/100s, f2.3, 1600:
http://fm.jirman.com/ISO-SS/3.jpg

Edited by stanj on Dec 14, 2007 at 09:09 AM GMT



Dec 14, 2007 at 12:18 AM
hahr
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


perhaps safety shift is meant for lower ISOs.   these don't look usable at all.

-erik



Dec 14, 2007 at 12:29 AM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Then they should say so

The pictures leading to this sequence, and those following, were acceptable as would be expected for the worse-than-horrible light (similar to the middle image). However, the stripes in the first, and the ... well, total darkness in the last are unexpected and indicative of a failure of some sort.



Dec 14, 2007 at 12:32 AM
hahr
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


i haven't tried this feature on my 1D3 to see if it works as advertised.   coming from using the original 1Ds for so many years, i always thought ISO 1600 was so clean on the 1Ds2 and 1D3 that i never worry about cranking ISO up the old fashioned way.

the stripes almost make me think that the safety shift came from image processing rather than increased sensitivity in the sensor.   it's weird.

-erik



Dec 14, 2007 at 12:45 AM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Can anyone with a 1Ds3 try this? You need to be in Centerweighed Average metering, as other metering modes lock exposure during a burst (AFAIK).


Dec 14, 2007 at 11:32 AM
Chrono1081
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


I dont use any saftey shifts on any camera for this very reason. Pics end up looking weird one way or another.


Dec 14, 2007 at 11:43 AM
Pondria
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


5 fps may be too fast for ISO switching to settle ?!?!


Dec 14, 2007 at 12:00 PM
Sam Bennett
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Oh boy, interference banding on a 1 Series! Woo hoo! Canon's on a roll now!


Dec 14, 2007 at 12:02 PM
FAU4U
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift



Thanks for the info on the ISO shift issue.
I will return CFn-1,8 from "3" back to "0"
until the Firmware is updated.



Dec 15, 2007 at 09:44 AM
Jeff
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Bummer. At least it's not a critical feature of the camera, although it should work as advertised. Hopefully it will be an easy firmware fix, and that'll be the end of it.

FAU4U wrote:
Thanks for the info on the ISO shift issue.
I will return CFn-1,8 from "3" back to "0"
until the Firmware is updated.


Actually, it would be interesting if you'd test your camera in that mode as Stan suggested, and see if you can confirm whether it's a widespread issue or not (though it sounds like it is).



Dec 15, 2007 at 10:43 AM
hahr
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Jeff wrote:
...and see if you can confirm whether it's a widespread issue or not (though it sounds like it is).


how does one user's result makes this sound like a widespread issue?   has anyone else reported problems with this feature?



Dec 15, 2007 at 05:17 PM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #12 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


One may argue that if it were just my camera they would not be issuing a new firmware, but what do I know.


Dec 15, 2007 at 06:12 PM
Jeff
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #13 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


That was what I was thinking too, but assumed it to be too obvious to bother typing... Silly me!


Dec 15, 2007 at 10:00 PM
Pondria
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #14 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Isn't the feature also available for 1D3 ? Jeff, you can try @ 10 fps. That will give us one more data point.



Dec 15, 2007 at 10:41 PM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #15 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Since we are at testing, note that you have to be in Centerweighed Average metering as otherwise the exposure will be locked in a burst (unless you have other fancy CFn set, I don't).


Dec 15, 2007 at 11:01 PM
Jeff
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #16 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Mine is in Virginia for the submirror fix. I'm not sure whether to say 'fortunately', or 'unfortunately', but it's there...


Dec 15, 2007 at 11:03 PM
Pondria
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #17 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Looking back, why would one need this feature any way ? I wouldn't want my camera to slide the ISO behind my back We are not talking about an entry level DSLR here.
On the other hand, Canon got rid of seemingly useful features from 1D series. (1) A-DOF mode (2) 1/250 shutter speed floor in Av mode with flash.




Dec 16, 2007 at 01:36 AM
stanj
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #18 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


I totally agree that DEP (not A-DEP as on the entry level cameras) was most useful. As was the sensible way of changing AF points with the rear dial, here since the 1v thru the mk2 cameras; now with the mk3 it's totally dumb. But I digress.

My reason for wanting this: When shooting indoors available light, with my fast primes, say I want ideally 1/100s shutter speed (or whatever). I also can pre-select f2 as being the max aperture the camera will use (if I feel like it, say for DOF). So I can go set it up like this, and set say ISO 400. For many shots, 1/100 at f2 may suffice. For others, just go ahead and change the ISO. With the 1Ds3 I feel comfortable all the way to 3200 (which it ironically never selects even if I have H enabled).

To me, it's just like the camera changing aperture or shutter speed "behind my back", except that sometimes having the aperture more-or-less fixed and having the same apply to shutter speed is useful. Ideally, I'd like to have SS do ISO and _then_ Tv/Av - it's possible that the camera will bump to 1600 and Tv 1/100 is impossible, then start dragging the shutter.

While I rarely use P mode, and rarely would use this SS setting as well, I totally see use for it - honestly, more than for the DEP on the mk1 cameras, and I used to love that feature

Now if I only could have my AF point selection back...



Dec 16, 2007 at 01:43 AM
recordproducti
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #19 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


Pondria wrote:
Looking back, why would one need this feature any way ? I wouldn't want my camera to slide the ISO behind my back We are not talking about an entry level DSLR here.
On the other hand, Canon got rid of seemingly useful features from 1D series. (1) A-DOF mode (2) 1/250 shutter speed floor in Av mode with flash.



Oh, so in Av you don't like the camera setting the shutter speed etc? I think that this feature is very useful. I have lost count of the times that I've ended up shooting at a higher ISO than I need and this is a great way to ensure that on a busy shoot the best possible quality is (when it works of course) obtained.



Dec 16, 2007 at 04:43 AM
Pondria
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #20 · 1Ds3 - banding with ISO SafetyShift


OK, I'll accept that Auto-ISO is logically similar to Av or Tv mode. For given exposure, one of 3 parameters { Aperture, Shutter speed, ISO } can change while the other two are fixed.
It's just that I'm not used to Auto-ISO. In Av or Tv mode, I can anticipate the effect of the automatic changes. It is almost my second nature instinct. In Auto-ISO mode, what is changing are DR and Noise of the photo. And the effects are very camera-dependent. It would take sometime for me to get used to.



Dec 16, 2007 at 10:55 AM
       2       3       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

       2       3       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account