fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              67              69              71       72       end
  

Archive 2007 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken

  
 
jianghai_ho
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #1 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


I don't want to name names, but IMHO There's a huge misconception as to what One-Shot and what AI Servo: actually does, and when they can or should be used. I've been involved in similar questions previously and it seems like if you believe the focus mode "nazis" one should use AI servo ONLY when things or people are moving towards and away from you.

The main benefit of AI servo for me is that focus is not locked - i.e. IF the subject (*or indeed the photographer) *moves* the camera can adjust to that movement. I ONLY use One Shot when the camera is on a tripod and the subject is still - when AI Servo could go into a feedback loop (like IS on a tripod). Remember that when you handhold even if the subject is still you can cause "movement" - because you are moving.

One Shot simply calculates the focus *it* thinks is best and goes to it, then stops. Doesn't make one shot more accurate than servo, i.e. whether it is or is not in focus it will stop wherever it feels it's got focus. It has it's place, for sure, but most of the time (for me), the chance that there will be some sort of movement (photographer, subject, etc) vastly outweigh the actual (or perceived) increase in accuracy of One Shot.

Someone please correct me if my conclusions are wildly inaccurate, but sometimes the FUD that gets spread around the internet is a little ridiculous (again IMHO). As far as I'm concerned actual field experience means a ton more than being able to quote from a users manual, and understanding of the actual mechanics (through theory and experience) is more important than (again) what's in the manual – How many here with older "fixed" 1D Mark IIIs actually believe what canon is now saying about the fix?



Mar 27, 2008 at 07:24 PM
Photon
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #2 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Randy Wright wrote:
I gotta tell you though, after getting my early model 1d Mark III-( bought June 2007 # 5253**) fixed again by Canon Irvine last week-(S/M fixed Dec. 2007, with 2 dots in battery compartment and 2 trips to Irvine in the last 3 weeks-the last to calibrate and mate my lens+tc's)-I am getting the MOST in-focus sequences of guys and gals surfing that I EVER had with my Mark III+600mm +/- my 1.4/2.0 tc. , ESPECIALLY AFTER I change my TRACKING preferences from CF 3-0 to CF3-1, from CF 4-1 to 0, and CF 8-1/2 to 0.

Sequence after sequence,
...Show more
Randy, I assume you're talking about all the CFn III settings? Setting #3 to 1 from 0, #4 from 1 to 0, #8 from 1 or 2 to 0?




Mar 27, 2008 at 07:25 PM
Photon
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #3 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Pixel Perfect wrote:
But at least with the 1D II say, assigning the AF to the * button and using AI servo, you can keep the * pressed down to track or if the motion stops release it and lock focus (ie one shot) and get the best of both worlds. So it's very easy to compare both approaches in a split second. I assume youy can do a similar thing with the 1D III?

Yes you can (with the AF start button doing what the * does on the II), and that's how I work. The only thing you can't do with the III is assign a different AF point to another back button and have that work exactly the same way as the first button except use a different point. You have to tap the "multi-controller" (joystick) to change point and THEN use the AF start button to focus/track/stop-focus. With the II, the * and the WB/+_ buttons can each be assigned an AF point and then do all the work with one press (release, press again, whatever's needed).



Mar 27, 2008 at 07:30 PM
Photon
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #4 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Alistair Watson wrote:
...Sure, your statement applies to xD and X0D bodies where AI-Servo mode (in my experience) has difficulty in maintaining focus on a static object but with a 1D series, in my experience, no problem.

Alistair, for whatever reason, my 1D3 does jump around a bit in AI-servo with a wide aperture lens and moderate magnification (i.e., fairly close subject distance), even on a tripod. I've still found it useful shooting static subjects hand-held at wide apertures, because the servo compensates for my rocking and seems to give results a bit more accurate than one-shot (especially if I take 2 shots ).

Because you are one of the busy and successful action shooters, I'd be curious to know your choices for custom functions related to AF/Drive. Any differences with the IIN that you also use?

As an example of shooting a relatively static subject using AI-servo, here's a shot with the 85/1.2, either wide open or a fraction of a stop down:

http://www.classicalphotography.com/blogpics/Petra_Berenyi1.jpg




Mar 27, 2008 at 07:47 PM
Hrow
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #5 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Many near macro shooters use Servo to compensate for photographer movement when shooting hand held. In fact, when shooting in close and using AF, choosing One Shot is a pretty good way to guarantee that you will miss focus.



Mar 27, 2008 at 08:28 PM
DavidP
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #6 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


My 1D-series cameras pretty much LIVE in AI-Servo mode . . . and with focus on the AF button (or * button in the older versions). I can't imagine shooting any other way.


Mar 27, 2008 at 09:03 PM
Randy Wright
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #7 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Photon wrote:
Randy, I assume you're talking about all the CFn III settings? Setting #3 to 1 from 0, #4 from 1 to 0, #8 from 1 or 2 to 0?



______________________________________________________________

Hi Photon,
That's correct, sorry I was not more specific!

I've regularly read FM, DPreview, Potn, Wally's 1d series forum, etc, just trying to learn tips get my early model 1d mark III to work as I think it should have. Hence I immediately got in line for the S/M fix, and was/am still waiting patiently for the supposed up-coming-(as RG reported) root fix...
But after reading the March 5th Canon anouncement stating the the 1d Mark III issue is pretty much fixed-(in street person terms) and that the camera was all it was meant to be, I figured it was time to take my copy down to Irvine, since I too had shots as Jeff, Hrow, Markuson, etc. had-(where the feet of a surfer were in focus-but their head was soft, the left side of a shot was sharp-right side soft+vice-verse, sequences where the first was totally in focus, BUT for some reason the next few would be OOF, even though I was using center focus, sometime with AF expansion/sometimes not and ZoomBrowser would show that focus was spot on)...

Anyways, to make a long story short, after 2 trips to Irvine in the last few weeks, 250 miles and 5 hours later, I picked up my camera/600 lens on Good Friday the 21, shot surfpix on Sat./Sun., was STILL unhappy with the performance while using the 600 +/- 1.4 tc when shooting sequences, decided to turn OFF all tracking CF's after viewing the images on ZB and only have the camera shoot whatever Focus Point I decided to use for the next session with the 600...

CF III-2 Kept at Med Fast -(Slow/Med Slow does not cut it for surfpix, I've found)
CF III-3 CHANGED from 0-(AF priority/Tracking priority) to 1-(AF priority/Drive speed priority)
CF III-4 CHANGED from 1-(Continuous AF track priority) to 0-(Main focus point priority)
CF III-5 Kept at 0-(Focus search ON)
CF III-8 CHANGED from 1or2-(AF expansion with selected pt) to 0-(Disable)

I also use rear focus, after CF IV-2 is enabled...

Viola! STOKED!!!
Shot about 425 surf/beachpix on a gorgeous sunny Monday, and practically every shot was sharp. In fact, I think outta that batch, I probably did not post only about 4-5 action shots to my gallery.
That was the BEST sesh I had ever had with the Mark III, so STOKED!!!
I guess my Mark III still has some kinda TRACKING ISSUE,
so I find that if I have the camera FOCUS at whatever point I use from the Inner 9, I can track better than it can(?)...
Anyways, I am sooo STOKED to get consistant sequences now after 3 trips back to Canon...

BUT I'll STILL try Colin's tip, who knows, maybe the 1d Mark III works best in One Shot mode for action photo's
Randy Wright
LAsurfpix.com

PS-I've read and tried using Canon's Optimizing settings PDF, WildlifeimagesbyLes, etc. to find out what works for me. Hope everyones Mark III is working OK...
PSS-Thanks to Jeff, Hrow, Alistar, simonella_viru, apdieb, momv630, etc. for sharing your Mark III stories,
I've learned alot and know the Mark III's problems are NOT MY FAULT!!!



Edited by Randy Wright on Mar 27, 2008 at 06:39 PM GMT



Mar 27, 2008 at 09:33 PM
apdieb
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #8 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


You mentioned CFIII-0 change to 1... That is the USM Lens Electronic MF correct? Gotta admit, not sure how that would help with AI Servo...but geez.. worth a shot...

Please correct me if I am wrong about which CF you're speaking about.




Mar 27, 2008 at 09:38 PM
Photon
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #9 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Randy Wright wrote:
Hi Photon,
That's correct, sorry I was not more specific!

Anyways, to make a long story short, after 2 trips to Irvine in the last few weeks, 250 miles and 5 hours later, I picked up my camera/600 lens on Good Friday the 21, shot surfpix on Sat./Sun., was STILL unhappy with the performance while using the 600 +/- 1.4 tc when shooting sequences, decided to turn OFF all tracking CF's after viewing the images on ZB and only have the camera shoot whatever Focus Point I decided to use for the next session with the 600...

CF III-2 Kept
...Show more
Thanks much for the clarification! I'll bet you are stoked, I would be too!



Mar 27, 2008 at 09:44 PM
apdieb
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #10 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


I just used these settings as mentioned above... Didn't do any real tests since I don't have any moving subjects.. However, I did point it at various objects and moved quickly backwards and forwards... The AF seemed to be much more rock solid..Perception anyway.. I haven't looked at any images... but the viewfinder subject didn't appear to hunt at all..

Wow.. I really need to do some tests this weekend. Never thought to turn off tracking functionality..




Mar 27, 2008 at 09:57 PM
Glen_C
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #11 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


BINGO.



jianghai_ho wrote:
The main benefit of AI servo for me is that focus is not locked - i.e. IF the subject (*or indeed the photographer) *moves* the camera can adjust to that movement. I ONLY use One Shot when the camera is on a tripod and the subject is still - when AI Servo could go into a feedback loop (like IS on a tripod). Remember that when you handhold even if the subject is still you can cause "movement" - because you are moving.

One Shot simply calculates the focus *it* thinks is best and goes to it, then stops. Doesn't make
...Show more



Mar 27, 2008 at 10:14 PM
apdieb
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #12 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


I use AI Servo and One-Shot... But in theory, since I use the AF-On button...in AI-SERVO a simple press and release is the same thing right? But by using AI-SERVO, I have the option of holding it down to engage continuous AF... Wouldn't that be an accurate statement?




Mar 27, 2008 at 10:18 PM
Glen_C
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #13 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


yes


Mar 27, 2008 at 11:23 PM
Alistair Watson
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #14 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Hi Photon,

The most significant difference between the way I configure the AF on my 1D2N and my 1D3 for sports and action stuff is the use of AF Expand. On my 1D2N I never used it for sports or motorsport, never really needed to. Sure, in low light (say rugby under floodlights at night) the AF on the N isn't as responsive as in bright light but giving the AF a fraction of a second longer to track before firing the shutter dramatically increases the keep rate - no surprise there.

The Mark 3 is different, I leave left/right AF expand dialled in all the time now, whatever the light, this gives me the keeper rate I need. For motorsport this doesn't cause me a problem because the car is covered by many more AF points. For rugby, where the players are often in a very tight group, from time to time I do see that the expand point has focussed, rather than the centre point, and thus at the slim dof a 400mm gives at f2.8 the wrong player is in focus. An annoyance? Yes, but I am learning to live with, or should I say 'tolerate' it.

I have experimented at length with the AI Servo tracking sensitivity. I didn't get on with +1 at all and at -1, well for what I shoot and for the way I shoot, lets just say 0 works best.

Side by side in good light at low ISOs, I still believe the N to have the more consistent AF system. That is to say, once it has acquired lock on the subject and assuming I smoothly track with the subject keeping the AF point in place.

With the N, I get far fewer (read hardly any) shots within the sequence out of focus, the Mark 3 does still yield the odd few frames out of focus for apparently no reason, again this decreases further using Expand, but not quite to the level I am used to with the N.

There is alot to like about the Mark 3, the ability to shoot very very useable results at ISO 6400 is great, the camera handling is far superior in my opinion so yes, I do like the 1D3. Will I ever love and trust it as much as my 1D2N? Not ever. Hopefully whatever replaces the 1D3 will restore this balance and I can go back to running 2 of the same model of body once again.

Hope this is useful.

Alistair



Mar 28, 2008 at 06:23 AM
Yakim Peled
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #15 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Hrow wrote:
Many near macro shooters use Servo to compensate for photographer movement when shooting hand held.


I agree. This twig was moving because of a slight wind. MF was useless. AI servo nailed it.

Happy shooting,
Yakim.









Mar 28, 2008 at 09:16 AM
Yakim Peled
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #16 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Hrow wrote:
In fact, when shooting in close and using AF, choosing One Shot is a pretty good way to guarantee that you will miss focus.


Hummmmm………..

I had good success with non moving subjects in One shot mode.

Happy shooting,
Yakim.












Mar 28, 2008 at 09:21 AM
Hrow
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #17 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


My only point is that one would be amazed at how much the photographer moves during a shot. If you are dead steady then great but that is a rarity (hence the need for tripods). Consider that head movement of an inch is a far greater percentage of the camera/subject distance when the subject is 18 inches away then it is when it is 18 feet away. When you AF on a subject at close distances and then move your head that one inch then there is a pretty good chance the shot is blown.

Once again we are back to the old saying that just because you can do something doesn't mean it is a good F'ing idea.



Mar 28, 2008 at 10:08 AM
SLD
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.68 #18 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Sorry to say i have read some many misleading info here regarding how to use ONESHOT and AI SERVO, very interesting though.....


Mar 28, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Yakim Peled
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #19 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Hrow wrote:
Once again we are back to the old saying that just because you can do something doesn't mean it is a good F'ing idea.


My wife keeps reminding me that, on different matters….

Happy shooting,
Yakim.




Mar 30, 2008 at 02:29 AM
gbee
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.68 #20 · ['NEW Fix' UPDATE!] - MkIII AF still broken


Personally, I've more or less found expansion to be too close to the ring of fire responses. If your lead player is in front, then fine ~ if not you that that nice tackle, to his side ~~

Alistair Watson wrote:
from time to time I do see that the expand point has focussed, rather than the centre point, and thus at the slim dof a 400mm gives at f2.8 the wrong player is in focus. An annoyance? Yes, but I am learning to live with, or should I say 'tolerate' it.Alistair




Mar 30, 2008 at 04:04 AM
1       2       3              67              69              71       72       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              67              69              71       72       end
    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account