jjlphoto Offline [X]
|
p.3 #10 · When is it ok to take pictures in public? | |
Mmusicman wrote:
I'm guessing that alot of the comments posted here are from people who are NOT parents.
I am the parent of two small children.
Spoken like a true paparazzi...making money of the unwanted images of others. I'm sorry, I didn't see it that way.
Unwanted by whom? If you want the shot, go for it. That is why you are photographing. Doesn't matter if you have plans to display it, sell them, have a slide show, or never let it see the light of day. If it was worthy enough for you to take the time and energy to make that exposure, why let others decide if it is okay for you to have that photo? It's none of their business.
DLNB wrote:
To me kids sports are about kids, family and fun. it shouldn't be all about proffit, or competition. I would not have my kids involved in a league where the parents could not snap photos. Just my choice.
You are obviously not a profession photographer.
Would you show up at church or school to snap your own where the pro is set up to produce the directory or yearbook shots? Of course not. The field has its upkeep, do you show up with a mower offering to mow it for free? Of course not. Do you show up with your own refrigerated truck full of lemonade and quench the team's thirsts for free, or let the concession stand take care of that? Out of respect for the photographer hired to be there, (it is his livelyhood, remember) one should not try to interfere.
In the case of the person who made that post about a commercial concern coming in twice a year to do pics, it would be reasonable to enforce and expect parents to observe an "exclusive" while the pro was there. To ban photography by parents for the entire season for arbitrary reasons is certainly up to the owners of the field to do such, unless it is a publically owned field. Then that ban could be challenged as it has no merit.
There have been a lot of knee jerk policies put into place lately with the proliferation of cell phones, and from people's boogie man phobias as well. However, companies like Apple, Sprint, ATT, Nokia, Ericksson, etc, have so much clout, I actually see enforcement of photography bans as being an uphill battle. Since the photography profession is not in a financial position to oppose all these bans, those corporate giants sure are. Their survival depends on people being able to take and send pics at will. As a pro, it would be great if only licensed pros could take and sell pics, but that is not realistic. I have to make sure my pics are obviously different, better, and have more value to the buying public than those taken by amatuers.
Edited by jjlphoto on Jul 04, 2007 at 04:53 PM GMT
|